Reversible thinking in solving mathematics problems in terms of cognitive style

Hakmi Rais Fauzan, Erry Hidayanto, Tjang Daniel Chandra

Abstract


Background: Reversible thinking, the ability to think bidirectionally, is a crucial component of mathematical problem-solving. Differences in cognitive styles, particularly field-dependent and field-independent characteristics, play a significant role in students' reversible thinking, necessitating a deeper exploration of these relationships.
Aim: This study aims to describe students' reversible thinking processes in solving mathematical problems based on their cognitive styles, focusing on field-dependent and field-independent traits.
Method: A qualitative descriptive approach was applied to 32 eighth-grade students from a junior high school in Malang City, Indonesia. Data were collected using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), a reversible thinking test, and semi-structured interviews. Students were categorized into field-dependent and field-independent groups using GEFT before undertaking a reversible thinking test. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain deeper insights into their problem-solving approaches.
Results: The findings indicate that students with field-independent cognitive styles exhibit better performance in the aspects of negation and reciprocity. They carefully apply problem-solving strategies, consistently reverting to initial values after achieving correct solutions. Conversely, students with field-dependent cognitive styles are more prone to errors, particularly in changing operation signs and applying the concept of reciprocal equivalence.
Conclusion: This study highlights significant differences in reversible thinking between students with field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles. The results suggest the need for tailored teaching methods to enhance reversible thinking based on cognitive styles. Further research is recommended to explore barriers and additional factors influencing reversible thinking.


Keywords


Cognitive Style; Problem-Solving; Reversible Thinking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliah, N., & Aripin, U. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa Smk Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i2.7487

Amalia, D. R., Theis, R., & Marlina. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Reversible Thinking Matematis Siswa pada Materi Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 212–223.

Anggraeni, R. E., Wulan, E. R., & Utomo, B. T. (2019). Pemecahan Masalah Polya Dari Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field-Independent. Journal of the Indonesian Matematics Education Society, 1(1), 11–18.

Balingga, E., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Murniati, N. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Reversibilitas Siswa MTs Kelas VII dalam Menyusun Persamaan Linier. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2016.1.2.117-131

Bharata, H., Sutiarso, S., Noer, S. H., & Kurniawati, D. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar LKPD untuk meningkatkan kemampuan reversible thinking siswa. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 260–272.

Darwanto. (2019). Hard Skills Matematik Siswa (Pengertian dan Indikatornya). Jurnal Eksponen, 9(1), 21–27.

Flanders, S. T. (2014). Investigating Flexibility, Reversibility, And Multiple Representations In A Calculus Environment (Vol. 4, Issue 1). University of Pittsburgh.

Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511565

Hasan, B. (2020). Proses Kognitif Siswa Field Independent dan Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.323-332

Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2018). Students ’ Reversible Reasoning on Function Composition Problem : Reversible on Function and Subtitution. International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 01(1), 9–24.

Inhelder, B. & P. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking From Child to Adolecence. Basic Book Inc.

Krutettski, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Survey of Recent East European Mathematical Literature. The University of Chicago Press.

Lestari, D. I., Waluya, S. B., & Mulyono. (2020). Mathematical Literacy Ability And Self-Efficacy Students In Search Solve Create And Share (SSCS) Learning With Contextual Approaches. Ujmer, 9(2), 2020–2156. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer

Maf’Ulah, S., Fitriyani, H., Yudianto, E., Fiantika, F. R., & Hariastuti, R. M. (2019). Identifying the reversible thinking skill of students in solving function problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012033

Maf’ulah, S., & Juniati, D. (2020). The effect of learning with reversible problem-solving approach on prospective-math-teacher students’ reversible thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13223a

Maf’ulah, S., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2017). The aspects of reversible thinking in solving algebraic problems by an elementary student winning national Olympiad medals in science. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(2), 189–194.

Muzaini, M., Ikram, M., & Sirajuddin, S. (2021). Analisis Proses Terjadinya Penalaran Reversibel Untuk Masalah Invers. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 744. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3450

Ngilawajan, D. A. (2013). Proses berpikir siswa sma dalam field independent dan field dependent. Pedagogia, 2(1), 71–83.

Nurlatifah, M., & Hakim, D. L. (2024). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REVERSIBLE SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(1), 130–143.

Purwaningrum, A. (2023). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Open-Ended Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Reversible Thinking Matematis Peserta Didik. Universitas Lampung.

Purwaningrum, A., & Sutiarso, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Reversible Thinking Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.821

Ramadhani, T. V., & Roesdiana, L. (2023). Kesalahan Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Ditinjau Dari Indikator Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 759–764. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.5056

Rusandi, & Muhammad Rusli. (2021). Merancang Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar/Deskriptif dan Studi Kasus. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v2i1.18

Sellah, M. L., Jacinta, D. K., & Helen, P. M. (2017). Analysis of Student-Teacher Cognitive Styles Interaction: An Approach to Understanding Learner Performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 10–20.

Siregar, N. F., & Nasution, E. Y. P. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Tadris (Pendidikan) Matematika, (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup), 20–27. http://prosiding.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/cacm

Suraji, Maimunah, & Saragih, S. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v3i2.3897

Susanto, A. (2013). Teori Belajar Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Kharisma Putra Utama.

Sutiarso, S. (2020). Analysis of Student Reversible Thinking Skills on Graph Concept. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6768

Syarifatul Maf’ulah, Jauhara Dian Nurul Iffah, Mochamad Nur Hasan, & Ilmi Auliya Rahma. (2023). Analisis Berpikir Reversible Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Statistika. Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v13i1.7342

Ulya, H., Kartono, & Retnoningsih, A. (2014). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education, 2014(Icmse), 1–7. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/October2014/45.pdf

Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 2896–2910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i1.6187




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v15i2.24527

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.