Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus

Al-Jabar focuses on improving mathematics learning techniques, including the development of mathematics evaluation instruments, the creation of mathematics learning media, and the development of mathematics learning models that take into account local wisdom and are enriched with religious and cultural principles. Research regarding Algebra materials is preferred. The journal also welcomes research on theoretical Algebra issues and current applied mathematics issues.

Scope

The scope of Al-Jabar includes:

  1. Development and Psychology of Education in the Context of Learning Mathematics

    • Cognitive development in mathematical learning.
    • Psychological aspects influencing mathematical understanding.
    • Pedagogical strategies for effective mathematics education.

  2. Learning Mathematics in Early Education

    • Innovative methods for teaching mathematics to young learners.
    • Early childhood numeracy and mathematical thinking.
    • Curriculum development for early mathematics education.

  3. Learning Mathematics in Primary and Secondary Education

    • Effective teaching practices for primary and secondary mathematics.
    • Assessment and evaluation in school mathematics.
    • Integration of technology in mathematics education at school levels.

  4. Learning Mathematics in Higher Education

    • Advanced teaching methodologies for undergraduate and graduate mathematics.
    • Research on higher education mathematics curriculum and instruction.
    • Professional development for mathematics educators in higher education.

  5. Applied Mathematics

    • Applications of mathematics in science, engineering, and economics.
    • Mathematical modeling and simulation.
    • Optimization and operations research.
    • Statistical and computational methods in applied mathematics.

  6. Algebra

    • Abstract algebra and its applications.
    • Linear algebra and matrix theory.
    • Computational algebra and symbolic computation.
    • Algebraic structures and their properties.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Every paper submitted to the Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika for publication is subject to peer review. The peer review in this journal is an evaluation of the submitted paper by two or more individuals of similar competence to the author. It aims to determine the academic paper's suitability for publication. The peer-review method is employed to maintain standards of quality and provide credibility to the papers. The peer review at Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika proceeds in 9 steps with the description as follows.
 
1. Submission of Paper
The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is carried out via an online system supported by the Open Journal System (OJS). But in order to facilitate authors, Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika temporarily also accepts paper submissions by email.
 
2. Editorial Office Assessment
The submitted paper is first assessed by the Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika editor. The editor checks whether it is suitable with the Journal focus and scope. The paper's composition and arrangement are evaluated against the journal's Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. In addition, an assessment of the minimum required quality of the paper for publication begins at this step, including one that assesses whether there is a major methodological flaw. Every submitted paper which passes this step will be checked by Turnitin to measure the similarity index which leads to plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers.
 
3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief 
The Editor-in-Chief checks if the paper is appropriate for the journal, sufficiently original, interesting, and significant for publication. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.
 
4. Invitation to Reviewers
The handling editor sends invitations to individuals who he or she believes would be an appropriate reviewer (also known as referees) based on expertise, the closeness of research interest, and no conflict of interest consideration. The peer review process at Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika focuses on the main issues in the development of algebraic sciences in both mathematics education and applied mathematics. In addition, Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika also discusses issues that generally exist in the field of mathematics education. The impartiality is also maintained by the double-blind peer review employed in this journal. That said, the reviewer does not know the author's identity, conversely, the author does not know the reviewer's identity.  The paper is sent to reviewers anonymously.
 
5. Response to Invitations
Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest, and availability. They then decide to accept or decline. In the invitation letter, the editor may ask the potential reviewer for the suggestion of an alternative reviewer, when he or she declines to review.
 
6. Review is Conducted
The reviewers allocate time to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewers may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept, or reject it, or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.
 
7. Journal Evaluates the Reviews
The Editor-in-Chief and handling editor consider all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely between both reviewers, the handling editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to obtain an extra opinion before making a decision.
 
8. The Decision is Communicated
The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Reviewer comments is sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. At this point, reviewers are also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review.
 
9. Final Steps
If accepted, the paper is sent to copy-editing. If the article is rejected or sent back to the author for either major or minor revision, the handling editor will include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. The author should make corrections and revise the paper per the reviewers' comments and instructions.
 
After revision has been made, the author should resubmit the revised paper to the editor.
 
If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive the revised version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.
 
If the editor is happy with the revised paper, it is considered to be accepted. The accepted papers will be published online and all are freely available as downloadable pdf files.

 

Publication Frequency

Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika published two times a year, in June and December each

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

Hasil gambar untuk Budapest Open Access Initiative 

Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies.

I. Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.


Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Gu don: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists 
Istv n R v: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant 
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the  Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.

Section A: Publication and authorship

All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. Review process are blind peer review. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika adheres to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following 4 criteria:

Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND

Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND

Final approval of the version to be published; AND

Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

In addition to being accountable for the parts of the work he or she has done, an author should be able to identify which co-authors are responsible for specific other parts of the work. In addition, authors should have confidence in the integrity of the contributions of their co-authors.

All those designated as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors. Those who do not meet all four criteria should be acknowledged—see Section II.A.3 below. These authorship criteria are intended to reserve the status of authorship for those who deserve credit and can take responsibility for the work. The criteria are not intended for use as a means to disqualify colleagues from authorship who otherwise meet authorship criteria by denying them the opportunity to meet criterion #s 2 or 3. Therefore, all individuals who meet the first criterion should have the opportunity to participate in the review, drafting, and final approval of the manuscript.

The individuals who conduct the work are responsible for identifying who meets these criteria and ideally should do so when planning the work, making modifications as appropriate as the work progresses. We encourage collaboration and co-authorship with colleagues in the locations where the research is conducted. It is the collective responsibility of the authors, not the journal to which the work is submitted, to determine that all people named as authors meet all four criteria; it is not the role of journal editors to determine who qualifies or does not qualify for authorship or to arbitrate authorship conflicts. If agreement cannot be reached about who qualifies for authorship, the institution(s) where the work was performed, not the journal editor, should be asked to investigate. The criteria used to determine the order in which authors are listed on the byline may vary, and are to be decided collectively by the author group and not by editors. If authors request removal or addition of an author after manuscript submission or publication, journal editors should seek an explanation and signed statement of agreement for the requested change from all listed authors and from the author to be removed or added.

The corresponding author is the one individual who takes primary responsibility for communication with the journal during the manuscript submission, peer-review, and publication process. The corresponding author typically ensures that all the journal’s administrative requirements, such as providing details of authorship, ethics committee approval, clinical trial registration documentation, and disclosures of relationships and activities are properly completed and reported, although these duties may be delegated to one or more co-authors. The corresponding author should be available throughout the submission and peer-review process to respond to editorial queries in a timely way, and should be available after publication to respond to critiques of the work and cooperate with any requests from the journal for data or additional information should questions about the paper arise after publication. Although the corresponding author has primary responsibility for correspondence with the journal, the ICMJE recommends that editors send copies of all correspondence to all listed authors.

When a large multi-author group has conducted the work, the group ideally should decide who will be an author before the work is started and confirm who is an author before submitting the manuscript for publication. All members of the group named as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, including approval of the final manuscript, and they should be able to take public responsibility for the work and should have full confidence in the accuracy and integrity of the work of other group authors. They will also be expected as individuals to complete disclosure forms.

Some large multi-author groups designate authorship by a group name, with or without the names of individuals. When submitting a manuscript authored by a group, the corresponding author should specify the group name if one exists, and clearly identify the group members who can take credit and responsibility for the work as authors. The byline of the article identifies who is directly responsible for the manuscript, and MEDLINE lists as authors whichever names appear on the byline. If the byline includes a group name, MEDLINE will list the names of individual group members who are authors or who are collaborators, sometimes called non-author contributors, if there is a note associated with the byline clearly stating that the individual names are elsewhere in the paper and whether those names are authors or collaborators.

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.

Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.

Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

Authors must participate in the peer review process.

Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.

Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.

Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.

Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.

Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.

Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author

Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.

Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.

Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.

Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.

Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.

Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.

Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.

Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.

Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.

Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.

Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.

Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.

Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.

Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.

Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board

Research ethics

Research involving humans

Research studies on humans (individuals, samples, or data) must have been performed in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Prior to starting the study, ethical approval must have been obtained for all protocols from the local institutional review board (IRB) or other appropriate ethics committee to confirm the study meets national and international guidelines for research on humans. A statement to confirm this must be included within the manuscript, which must provide details of the name of the ethics committee and reference/permit numbers where available.

For non-interventional studies (e.g. surveys), where ethical approval is not required (e.g. because of national laws) or where a study has been granted an exemption by an ethics committee, this should be stated within the manuscript with a full explanation. Where a study has been granted exemption, the name of the ethics committee which provided this should also be included. However, if the researcher is in doubt, they should always seek advice from the relevant department before conducting the study.

Non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory language should be used when describing different groups by race, ethnicity, age, disease, disability, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Human studies categorized by such groupings should include an explanation of the definitions and categories, including whether any rules of human categorization were required by the relevant funding agencies.

Ethical approval for all studies must be obtained before the research is conducted. Authors must be prepared to provide further information to the journal editorial office upon request.

Ethical considerations for different human study designs

Consent for research involving children, adolescents, and vulnerable or incapacitated study participants

Written informed consent must be obtained from the parent or guardian of any participants who are not able to provide full informed consent themselves. Age of legal adulthood is determined by the country in which study participants are based, which is typically between ages 16-18. A statement to confirm informed consent has been obtained must be included within the manuscript.

In settings where verbal informed consent has been obtained rather than written informed consent, this must be explained and stated within the manuscript.

In accordance with the principles outlined in the Nuremberg Code and the Belmont Report, informed consent must have been given with free will, under no coercion or bribery of any kind.

Retrospective studies

Researchers must confirm they have obtained ethical approval to conduct the study, as well as permission from the dataset owner to use the information in databases/repositories for the purposes of the research they are conducting. Where permission to use information from a database/repository is not required (e.g. where it is publicly available and unrestricted re-use is permitted via an open license), a statement to explain this must be included within the manuscript.

 

Data acquired must be kept anonymized unless otherwise advised by the owners of the content in the database. Where participants’ details are not required to be anonymized, authors must be able to provide evidence that written informed consent, including consent to publish, was obtained from participants. A statement to confirm this must be included within the manuscript.

 

Survey studies

Researchers must ensure they have informed all participants why the research is being conducted, whether or not anonymity is assured, and how the data they are collecting is being stored. The participant’s right to confidentiality should always be considered and they should be fully informed about the aims of the research and if there are any risks associated. Their voluntary consent to participate should be recorded and any legal requirements on data protection should be adhered to.

As with all research studies, ethics approval from an appropriate IRB/local ethics committee must be obtained prior to conducting the study. A statement to confirm this must be included within the manuscript. In settings where ethics approval for survey studies is not required, authors must include a statement to explain this within the manuscript.

Covert observational research

As the nature of this type of research does not provide study participants the opportunity to opt-out or provide full informed consent, researchers must ensure they have considered the full rationale for the covert nature of their research and obtain ethical approval to conduct the study from an appropriate ethics committee. Ideally, researchers should seek informed consent from the study participants after the completion of the study. Authors must include a statement within the manuscript to provide the rationale for the covert nature of the research and the details of the name of the ethics committee(s) which approved the study and include the reference/permit numbers where available. Please note, the Editor reserves the right to deem research of this type not suitable for consideration in their journal.

 

Research on indigenous communities

Authors should be aware of any specific research ethics approval and informed consent procedures which need to be followed in order to conduct research in communities where special processes for permissions may exist. Authors should also be aware of cultural sensitivities or any restrictions associated with the publication of content, including images included in their manuscripts. In many indigenous communities, additional permissions may need to be sought from community leaders or an Elder.

Authors working with indigenous communities are advised to consult appropriate guidelines for ethical research and publishing (including requirements for authorship) such as the AIATSIS Guidelines for ethical publishing, the National Inuit Strategy on Research and Interviewing Elders: Guidelines from the National Aboriginal Health Organization. Authors conducting research using media tools are advised to consult appropriate guidelines such as the On Screen Protocols & Pathways: A Media Production Guide to Working With First Nations, Metis, and Inuit Communities, Cultures, Concepts & Stories.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Al-Jabar is committed to upholding the highest integrity and academic honesty standards. We take plagiarism and other forms of research misconduct very seriously. This policy outlines our approach to detecting and handling plagiarism.

Plagiarism occurs when an author uses someone else's work, ideas, or words without appropriate attribution or permission. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Direct copying of text from another source without quotation marks and proper citation.
  • Paraphrasing or rephrasing someone else's work without proper attribution.
  • Using ideas or data from another source without acknowledgement.
  • Submitting work that is not the author’s own.

Similarity Index

All submitted manuscripts will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin. The maximum acceptable similarity index is 25%. Manuscripts that exceed this threshold will be rejected.

Screening Process

  1. Initial Screening: Upon submission, each manuscript will be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin.
  2. Threshold Evaluation: If the similarity index is 25% or less, the manuscript will proceed to the peer review process.
  3. High Similarity: If the similarity index exceeds 25%, the manuscript will be immediately rejected. Authors will be notified and provided with the plagiarism report.

Consequences of Plagiarism

If plagiarism is detected at any stage (before or after publication), the following actions will be taken:

  1. Manuscript Rejection: The manuscript will be rejected if plagiarism is detected during submission.
  2. Retraction: The article will be retracted if plagiarism is discovered after publication. The journal will publish a retraction notice, and the author's institution may be notified.
  3. Author Notification: The corresponding author will be notified of the plagiarism and provided with a copy of the plagiarism report.

Author Responsibilities

Authors must ensure their work is original and all sources are appropriately cited. Authors should:

  • Check their manuscripts for potential plagiarism before submission.
  • Properly attribute all sources of information, data, and ideas.
  • Obtain necessary permissions for any third-party material used in their work.

Contact Information

For any questions or concerns regarding our plagiarism policy, please contact us at jurnalaljabar@radenintan.ac.id.

 

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

The fee for article publication in the Al-Jabar is $100.

 

Revenue Sources

Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is an open-access journal, which is published in both online and print versions. The journal receives funding from authors to cover costs related to improvements and administration. Additionally, Al-Jabar also receives supplementary income from UIN Raden Intan Lampung. These sources of income are utilized in maintaining administrative functions and covering print costs. A very non-significant part of the revenue also comes from subscriptions.

 

Guidelines for Advertising

  1. All advertisements should be approved by the publisher or editor.
  2. Advertisements are a separate section from content. Editors should not shape the content to accommodate advertising while advertisers and sponsors should not have advanced knowledge of our editorial content.
  3. The advertisement in the publisher‘s journal is not a guarantee, nor an endorsement of the given product, service, company, or of the claims made in such advertising by the publisher, society, or editorial partner.
  4. Advertising is clearly distinguished from the editorial content.
  5. Advertisers have no control or influence over the results of searches a user may conduct on the publisher's journal.
  6. All advertisements should identify the advertiser by trademark or signature.
  7. The publisher is not responsible for any damages, including but not limited to actual, direct, incidental, or consequential damages, for errors in displaying an advertisement.
  8. Any use of publication trademarks or copyrighted material for a link to and from the website must be approved, in advance, by the publisher. Any such unauthorized linking is prohibited.
  9. All advertisements must be nondiscriminatory in terms of sex, age, race, religion, marital status, or physical handicap, comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
  10. The publisher does not release personally identifiable data on the users of our websites.

 

Direct Marketing

In promoting the journal and the results of research, the journal conducts direct marketing activities, including solicitation of manuscripts that are conducted on behalf of the journal, appropriate, well-targeted, and unobtrusive. All information provided about the publisher or journal is expected to be truthful and not misleading for readers or authors.

 

Deposit Policy

The submitted version, accepted version, and published version can be deposited in an institutional or other repository of the author’s choice at any time. A few to mention, author(s) may deposit and use the document as follows:

  • on the personal website
  • on the company or institutional repository
  • on subject repositories
  • with individuals requesting personal use for teaching and training within the author's institution, and as part of an author's grant applications or theses/doctorate submissions, etc.

Please visit the journal Copyright Notice make sure that you consult all of the related policies on the website to prevent any disputes or doubts. If you have any inquiries, contact Editor jurnalaljabar@radenintan.ac.id.

 

Withdrawal of Manuscript

The author is not allowed to withdraw submitted or published manuscripts (unless there are compelling reasons), because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and reviewers spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the publisher.
 
If the author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript the author will be asked to submit an "Article withdrawal Form" signed by all authors (or) the corresponding author of the manuscript stating the reasons for manuscript withdrawal. Authors must not assume that their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification to this effect from the editorial office. Please contact jurnalaljabar@radenintan.ac.id for the "Article withdrawal Form".
 
However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted or published manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.

 

Cited in Scopus

Source: scopus.com

Al-Jabar is cited by articles on Scopus database at least 166 times for 25 documents since published in June 2015. 

  1. Anwar, M. S., Choirudin, C., Ningsih, E. F., Dewi, T., & Maseleno, A. (2019). Developing an interactive mathematics multimedia learning based on ispring presenter in increasing students’ interest in learning mathematics. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 135-150. Cited 18 times
  2. Syazali, M. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Berbantuan Maple II Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 91-98. Cited 15 times
  3. Andini, M., & Yunianta, T. N. H. (2018). The development of borad game “the adventure of algebra” in the senior high school mathematics learning. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 95-109. Cited 13 times
  4. Rakhmawati, R. (2016). Aktivitas matematika berbasis budaya pada masyarakat lampung. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 221-230. Cited 12 times
  5. Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., Baiduri, B., Choirudin, C., & Wawan, W. (2022). Digital comic learning media based on character values on students’ critical thinking in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 49-66. Cited 8 times
  6. Arifin, S., Muktyas, I. B., Prasetyo, P. W., & Abdillah, A. A. (2021). Unimodular matrix and bernoulli map on text encryption algorithm using python. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 447-455. Cited 8 times
  7. Kusumawati, R., & Nayazik, A. (2018). Developing mathematics learning strategy module based on journal review. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 111-120. Cited 8 times
  8. Nugroho, A. A., Putra, R. W. Y., Putra, F. G., & Syazali, M. (2017). Pengembangan blog sebagai media pembelajaran matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 197-203. Cited 8 times
  9. Putra, F. G. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran reflektif dengan pendekatan matematika realistik bernuansa keislaman terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 203-210. Cited 7 times
  10. Netriwati, N. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matetamtis Berdasarkan Teori Polya ditinjau dari Pengetahuan Awal Mahasiswa IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1-10. Cited 7 times
  11. Putra, R. W. Y., & Anggraini, R. (2016). Pengembangan bahan ajar materi trigonometri berbantuan software iMindMap pada siswa SMA. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 39-47. Cited 6 times
  12. Supriadi, N., & Damayanti, R. (2016). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa lamban belajar dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun datar. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1-9. Cited 6 times
  13. Bulu, V. R., & Tanggur, F. (2021). The effectiveness of STEM-based PjBL on student’s critical thinking skills and collaborative attitude. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 219-228. Cited 5 times
  14. Susanti, V. D., Andari, T., Harenza, A. (2020). Web based learning media assisted by powtoon in basic mathematics lesson. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 11-20. Cited 5 times
  15. Syafitri, Q., Mujib, M., Netriwati, N., Anwar, C., & Wawan, W. (2018). The mathematics learning media uses Geogebra on the basic material of linear equations. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 9-18. Cited 5 times
  16. Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2016). Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah-langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 63-74. Cited 5 times
  17. Kesumawati, N., & Octaria, D. (2019). Developing Statistics Learning Equipment Based on the PMRI Approach Oriented to Students’ Statistical Reasoning Ability. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 87-99. Cited 4 times
  18. Susanto, A. S., Bharata, H., & Dahlan, S. (2018). The effect of cooperative learning model Think-Talk-Write (TTW) type on mathematical problem-solving abilities in terms of learning habits. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika., 9(1), 33-40. Cited 4 times
  19. Kristanto, V. H. (2017). Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Melalui Penerapan Lesson Plan Berbasis Multiple Intelligence. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 25-34. Cited 4 times
  20. Hamidah, K., & Suherman, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di tinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 231-248. Cited 4 times
  21. Suherman, S. (2015). Kreativitas siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika materi pola bilangan dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR). Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 81-90. Cited 4 times
  22. Setiana, D. S., Ili, L., Rumasoreng, M. I., & Prabowo, A. (2020). Relationship between cooperative learning method and students’ mathematics learning achievement: A meta-analysis correlation. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 145-158. Cited 3 times
  23. Kaharuddin, A., & Hajeniati, N. (2020). An identification of students’ responses based on SOLO taxonomy in mathematics learning toward learning activities and learning outcomes. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 191-200. Cited 3 times
  24. Farida, F., Hartatiana, H., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2019). The use of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in improving mathematical analogical ability and habits of mind. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 175-186. Cited 3 times
  25. Yumiati, Y., & Kusumah, Y. (2019). Interaction between Students' Learning and Early Mathematical Skills to Increase Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 125-134. Cited 3 times