Creating a diagnostic test to assess conceptual understanding of fraction operations

Dia Prima Juwita, Ahmad Yani T, Yundari Yundari

Abstract


Background: Fraction operations are fundamental in mathematics education, yet many students face challenges in mastering these concepts. Effective assessment tools are crucial for identifying areas of difficulty and guiding instructional improvements.
Aim: This study aims to develop a diagnostic test to accurately measure the conceptual understanding of fraction operations among students in the Elementary School Teacher Education Program (PGSD) at STKIP Melawi.
Method: Utilizing a research and development approach with mixed methods, this study follows Ebel's Model of Test Development. The process includes item selection, validation, and reliability testing, involving both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
Results: The developed diagnostic test demonstrated strong validity and reliability metrics. Analysis revealed that students commonly struggle with both the conceptual and procedural aspects of fraction operations. Frequent errors were noted in the interpretation and execution of solution steps. No student achieved the highest possible score, indicating significant gaps in understanding. The N-Gain analysis showed an average score of 0.5610, suggesting medium to high effectiveness in identifying learning challenges, with individual scores ranging from 0.32 to 0.93.
Conclusion: The diagnostic test developed in this study provides a robust tool for assessing the conceptual understanding of fraction operations. It highlights specific areas where students encounter difficulties, offering valuable insights for targeted instructional strategies. Integrating this diagnostic test into the curriculum can enhance the ability to diagnose and address learning obstacles, ultimately improving mathematics education outcomes.

Keywords


Arithmetic, Diagnostic test, Operation, Fraction, Ebel's model of test.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asnawi, A., Sahudra, T. M., Ramadhani, D., Kenedi, A. K., Aosi, G., Wardhana, M. R., & Khalil, N. A. (2023). Development of Digital Diagnostic Test Instruments for Differentiated Learning Process in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9ispecialissue.6125

Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004

Bentley, B., & Bossé, M. J. (2018). College Students’ Understanding of Fraction Operations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3881

Bhakti, Y. B., Astuti1, I. A. D., & Prasetya, R. (2022). Four-Tier Thermodynamics Diagnostic Test (4T-TDT) to Identify Student Misconception. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.11958

Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Butler, M. H., & Toland, M. D. (2014). Detecting and Correcting Fractions Computation Error Patterns. Exceptional Children, 80(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291408000207

Dewi, S. P., Lidyawati, Y., & Destiansari, E. (2022). How is The Implementation of Diagnostic Tests in Biology Learning in South Sumatra? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.1859

Dyson, N., Jordan, N. C., Rodrigues, J., Barbieri, C., & Rinne, L. (2018). A Fraction Sense Intervention for Sixth Graders With or At Risk for Mathematics Difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139

Fennell, F., & Karp, K. (2017). Fraction Sense: Foundational Understandings. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 648–650. Scopus.

Flores, M. M., Hinton, V., & Meyer, J. M. (2018). Teaching Fraction Concepts Using the Concrete-Representational-Abstract Sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477

Gürel, D. K., Eryılmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science &Amp; Technological Education, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Jing, T., & Siegler, R. S. (2016). Fractions Learning in Children With Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416662032

Kırbulut, Z. D., & Geban, Ö. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Pratiwi, R. E., & Raharjo, R. (2021). Students’ Misconceptions Profile in Cell Bioprocess using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n3.p456-463

Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2015). Fraction Interventions for Students Struggling to Learn Mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515572910

Shin, Y., & Kim, J.-W. (2024). Fundamental basics on measurement instruments and techniques for ultrafast magnetism dynamics. Current Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2024.01.008

Siegler, R. S., & Pyke, A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200

Soeharto, S., CsapÃ, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A Review of Students’ Common Misconceptions in Science and Their Diagnostic Assessment Tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649

Wilkins, J. L. M., & Norton, A. (2018). Learning progression toward a measurement concept of fractions. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0119-2

Yuberti, Y., Suryani, Y., & Kurniawati, I. (2020). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test with Certainty of Response Index to Identify Misconception in Physics. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v15i2.22680

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.