The Influence of Using Bingo Game Towards Students’ Vocabulary Mastery at the First Semester of the Seventh Grade of MTs N 2 Bandar Lampung in the Academic Year of 2016/2017

Nurul Puspita, Amelya Herda Losari

Abstract


Vocabulary is one of the important language elements that should be mastered by the students. Based on the preliminary research at MTs N 2 Bandar Lampung, the researcher found that there were 67.70% students’ vocabulary score less than the standard minimun score (KKM) which is 75. The objective of this research was to know whether there is an influence of using bingo game towards students’ vocabulary mastery or not. The method of the research was quasi experimental design with the treatment held in three meetings, 2x40 minutes in each meeting. The population of this research was the seventh grade students of MTs N 2 Bandar Lampung. For taking the sample, the researcher used cluster random sampling. The sample was two classes, class VII H as the experimental class and class VII I as the control class. Both of them consisted of 32 students. In collecting the data, the researcher used tests. The researcher used the test instrument in the form of multiple choice.  The test consisted of 40 items before validity test. After the validity test, the instrument test for pretest consisted of 22 items and posttest consisted of 22 items. For analyzing the data, the researcher used Mann Whitney Test. From the data analysis, it was found that the result of Mann Whitney Test was 0.000. This result is consulted to the score of the value significant generated Sig. (pvalue) < α = 0.05. Therefore, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. In other words, from this research it is known that bingo game can influence the students’ vocabulary mastery. It can be concluded that there is a significant influence of using bingo game towards students’ vocabulary mastery.

References


Angela, Coco.et,al, “Bingo for Beginners: A Game Strategy for Facilitating Action Learning”, vol. 29, Nu. 4.

Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, 4thed.

H. Hiebert, Elfrieda and Michael L. Kamil.2005. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary, New Jersey :Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hadfield, Jill. 1990. Elementary Vocabulary Games.London: Longman Ltd.

Hornby,AS. 1987.Oxford Advanced Learner’s of Current English. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

J.S, Richardson, and Morgan, R.F. 2007. Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. Belmont,CA: Cengage Learning.

Nurhemida. 2007. “The Relationship between Morphological Awareness and English Vocabulary Knowledge of Indonesian Senior High School Students”. Unpublished Thesis : Queensland University.

Police, Code of the District of Columbia,(August 12,2014).

RemkoTroncon, Fun Classroom Activity, (Nov.24, 2014).

Setiyadi,Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pelajaran Bahasa Asing Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Silberman, L. Melvin . 1996. Active Learning:101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Swiss Institute of Comparative Law. 2006. Study of Gambling Services in the Internal Market of The European Union. Lausanne: Swiss Institute of Comparative Law.

Thornburry, Scott. 2002. How to teach Vocabulary. Edinburgh: Longman.

Webster. 1988. The New Webster Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford University Press.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24042/ee-jtbi.v9i2.386