HOTS Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy : Analysis in English Examination Test Items Used in High School Level
Abstract
Today, humans must think critically to face all challenges. In order to improve Indonesia's PISA survey results, the government developed the 2013 curriculum, which emphasizes critical and creative thinking. The aims of this research were to determine the proportion of HOTS and HOTS characteristics reflected in high school English test questions. The objects of the research were the English midterm and final exams for the 10th and 11th grades in the second semester of the 2021–2022 academic year used at MAN 1 Lampung Tengah. This study used a qualitative content analysis design. The study found that in the mid-term 10 grade, there were 6 items, or 20%, labeled "very low," whereas in the mid-term 11 grade, 14 items, or 46.67%, were labeled "enough." For the final Exam 10 class, 5 items were found at 12.50%, referred to as "very low," and 13 items were found at 32.50%, referred to as "low." The outcomes of HOTS-based questions were 86.84%, with questions about critical thinking abilities being the most prominent. This was followed by HOTS questions that help students develop creative thinking abilities (10.52%) and questions that aid in the development of problem-solving skills (2.63%).
References
Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Chintia, Gita Realita, Machdalena Vianty, and Ida Rosmalina. 2018. “An Investigation Into Students’ PISA Reading Literacy Performance and Reading Engagement” The Journal of English Literacy Education. Volume 5, Number 2, Nov 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v5i2.7245
Fatimah, Siti, and Triesninda Pahlevi. 2020. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Pada Kompetensi Dasar Menerapkan Sistem Penyimpanan Arsip Sistem Abjad, Kronologis, Geografis, Nomor, dan Subjek di Jurusan OTKP SMKN 1 Bojonegoro.” Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP) Volume 8, Nomor 2, 2020 8 (2020): 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v8n2.p318-328
Fauziyah, Zulafa Hayati. (2021). “The Analysis of HOTS in English Test Items Used in Junior High Schools during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Indonesian Context,”. Graduate Thesis. Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University.
Fitriani, Walida Wahid. 2019. “The Realization of HOTS on Summative Test Items Designed by English Teacher Group Discussion,” English Focus Vol. 2, No. 2. http://englishfocus.upstegal.ac.id/efj/. DOI: 10.24905/efj.v2i2.64
Fırat, Tahsin, and İlhan Koyuncu. 2021. “Investigating Reading Literacy in PISA 2018 Assessment.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 13, no. 2 (January 1, 2021): 263–75. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189.
Hartini, Puji, Hari Setiadi, and Ernawati Ernawati. 2021. “Cognitive Domain Analysis (LOTS and HOTS) Assessment Instruments Made by Primary School Teachers.” Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 25, no. 1 (June 30, 2021). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411.
Mahdiansyah, Sendah Sembiring, Teguh Supriyadi, Ikhya Ulumudin, and Sisca Fujianita. (2017). Penilaian Kependidikan: Sistem Penilaian, Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Guru Melaksanakan Penilaian Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kemendikbud, Jakarta. ISBN 9786028613729.
Narwianta, Nanang, Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati, and Dwi Rukmini. 2019. “The Evaluation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in English School Nationally Standardized Examination at State Senior High School 6 Semarang,” English Education Journal. EEJ 9 (3) (2019) 316 - 326. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej . DOI 10.15294/EEJ.V9I3.30937
Purwadi Sutanto, et al. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) BAHASA INGGRIS. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Putra, Tomy Kartika, and Debiga Fikky Abdullah. 2019. “Higher-Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Questions in English National Examination in Indonesia.” Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia 11, no. 1 (June 24, 2019): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2019.11.1.145-160.
Suyati, Yohana Lusia Arie, and Antonius Totok Priyadi. 2021. “Analisis Soal Tipe HOTS Dalam Soal Ujian Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMP Kabupaten Sanggau.” JPPK (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa), 9, 10 (2021): 13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v10i9.49632
Syahdanis, Junitri Dian, Dedi Sofyan, and Wisma Yunita. 2021. “Analysis of HOTS in English Teacher-Made Test.” JURNAL BASIS 8, no. 2 (October 23, 2021): 203–16. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v8i2.4479.
DOI: 10.24042/ee-jtbi.v16i1.16103
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
