The implementation effect of realistic mathematics education and contextual teaching and learning approaches on the students' mathematical communication ability: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Over the last ten years, many studies have discussed the effect of implementing the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approaches on students' mathematical communication ability. However, these studies show inconsistent results. This study aims to analyze the effect of implementing the RME learning approach, the effect of implementing the CTL approach, and the difference in the effect of implementing the RME learning approach compared to the CTL approach on students' mathematical communication ability. This research used a quantitative approach with a meta-analysis method. The search for research articles with publication years from 2012 to 2022 was carried out using several databases, namely DOAJ, ERIC, Google Scholar, IOP Publishing, Garuda Portal, Semantic Scholar, and national journals link. Using the PRISMA protocol, the authors obtained 15 research articles on RME and 14 research articles on CTL that met the inclusion criteria and could be used in this study. The results of this study showed that the implementation of the RME learning approach has a moderate influence (g = 0,820) on students' mathematical communication ability, and the implementation of the CTL approach has a strong influence (g = 1,017) on students' mathematical communication ability. There is no significant difference between the effect of the RME learning approach's implementation and the CTL approach's effect on students' mathematical communication ability (Q_value = 2,329, p_value = 0,127). Therefore, the RME and CTL learning approaches can be used as learning alternatives that aim to enhance students' mathematical communication ability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, B. I. (2012). Peningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan komunikasi matematika siswa sd melalui pendekatan realistic mathematics education (RME). Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY dengan tema “Kontribusi Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika dalam Membangun Karakter Guru dan Siswa,” 149–164.
Anggraini, N., Pertiwi, N. I., & Afrilianto, M. (2019). Penerapan pendekatan realistic mathematic education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa MTs. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 2(5), 283–292.
Ariyanti, H. P. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran matematika realistik terhadap kemampuan matematis siswa (ditinjau dari kemampuan representasi dan komunikasi). Buana Matematika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 25–30.
Bernard, M. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan penalaran serta disposisi matematik siswa SMK dengan pendekatan kontekstual melalui game adobe flash CS 4.0. Infinity, 4(2), 197–222.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. In John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bunga, N., Isrok’atun, & Julia. (2016). Pendekatan realistic mathematics education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi dan komunikasi matematis siswa. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 441–450.
Coe, R. (2002). It ’s the effect size, stupid. what effect size is and why it is important. the british educational research association annual conference.cohen, louis, lawrence manion, dan keith morrison. Research Methods in Education 6th Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education 6th Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (2009). Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis 2nd edition. Russell Sage Foundation.
Fajri, N., Hajidin, & Ikhsan, M. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan koneksi dan komunikasi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL). PARADIKMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 149–161.
Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694.
Fitria, H., Surya, E., & Simbolon, N. (2021). The effect of realistic mathematical approaches and learning independence on students’ mathematical communication ability SD Negeri Cot Meuraja. BirLE-Journal (Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education), 4(1), 555–569.
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18.
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111–129.
Helmiati. (2012). Model Pembelajaran. Aswaja Pressindo.
Heryan, U. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa sma melalui pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik berbasis etnomatematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(2), 94–106.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 2nd Edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Jannah, W. N. (2014). Pembelajaran kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah (aspek metakognitif) dan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1), 100–108.
Jenab, S., Islamiyati, M., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP untuk mengetahui pengaruh pendekatan kontekstual. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(5), 941–948.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning What It is and Why It’s Here to Stay. Corwin Press, Inc.
Johnson, E. B. (2014). Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna (I. Setiawan (ed.)). Penerbit Kaifa.
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Tamur, M. (2022). A meta-analysis of the last two decades of realistic mathematics education approaches. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 381–400.
Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). Pengantar analisis meta. UPI Press.
Jupri, A. (2017). Pendidikan matematika realistik: Sejarah, teori, dan implementasinya. In U. S. Saud, W. Sopandi, & H. Handayani (Ed.), Bunga rampai kajian pendidikan dasar: Umum, matematika, bahasa, sosial, dan sains (page. 85–95). UPI Press.
Kusumaningtias, A., Syaripudin, T., & Fitriani, A. D. (2021). Perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SD yang menggunakan pendekatan RME dan pendekatan konvensional. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 25–34.
Manurung, S. L. (2017). Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP Negeri 14 Medan dengan pendekatan CTL. Semnastika UNIMED, 7(2).
Marpaung, M., Minarni, A., & Panjaitan, T. (2020). The effect of mathematics realistic education aided by mathematics software towards solving mathematical communication problems of Junior High School Students. BirLE-Journal (Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education), 3(3), 1445–1455.
Muslimahayati. (2019). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dengan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik bernuansa etnomatematika (PMRE). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 5(1), 22–40.
Nababan, M. J. (2018). Perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa kelas viii smp antara siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan matematika realistik dan pembelajaran konvensional. Jurnal Curere, 2(2), 105–112.
Nainggolan, A. C. (2015). Penerapan pembelajaran kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan koneksi matematis siswa SMP Pencawan Medan. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan FKIP-UHN, 2(2), 107–118.
Nasution, H. A., & Nurdalilah. (2017). Implementasi pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Mathematic Paedagogic, 2(1), 16–22.
Nofrianto, A., Maryuni, N., & Amri, M. A. (2017). Komunikasi matematis siswa: pengaruh pendekatan matematika realistik. Jurnal Gantang, 2(2), 113–122.
Nooryanti, S., Utaminingsih, S., & Bintoro, H. S. (2020). Pengaruh pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik berbasis etnomatematika terhadap komunikasi matematis siswa sekolah dasar. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 30–34.
Nurmala, I., Hidayat, W., & Hendriana, H. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa sekolah menengah pertama melalui pendekatan contextual teaching and learning. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(1), 21–29.
Palinussa, A. L., Molle, J. S., & Gaspersz, M. (2021). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematical reasoning and communication ability in rural contexts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 522–534.
Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Kartianom, Djidu, H., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Pengantar analisis meta. Parama Publishing.
Rohaeti, E. E., Hendriana, H., & Sumarmo, U. (2019). Pembelajaran inovatif matematika bernuansa pendidikan nilai dan karakter. PT Refika Aditama.
Ruqoyyah, S. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa MA melalui contextual teaching and learning. Jurnal Ilmiah P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 5(2), 85–99.
Ruseffendi, H. E. T. (2014). Hakikat matematika. In Perkembangan Pendidikan Matematika. Universitas Terbuka.
Rustam, A., & Handayani, A. L. (2017). Efectivity of contextual learning towards mathematical communication ability of the 7th Grade of SMPN 2 Kolaka. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–10.
Safitri, J., Zanthy, L. S., & Hendriana, H. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa smp dengan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL). JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(4), 575–582.
Senjayawati, E. (2015). Penerapan pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematik siswa SMK di Kota Cimahi. Didaktik, 9(1), 33–39.
Shah, A., Jones, M. P., & Holtmann, G. J. (2020). Basics of meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 39(5), 503–513.
Sugandi, A. I. (2015). Penerapan pendekatan konstektual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan pemecahan masalah serta disposisi matematis siswa SMA. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015, 453–460.
Sugandi, A. I., & Benard, M. (2018). Penerapan pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Analisa, 4(1), 16–23.
Suhaedi, D. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa smp melalui pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY dengan tema “Kontribusi Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika dalam Membangun Karakter Guru dan Siswa,” 191–202.
Tamur, M., Jehadus, E., Nendi, F., Mandur, K., & Murni, V. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of the contextual teaching and learning model on students’ mathematical understanding ability: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1).
Tamur, M., Juandi, D., & Adem, A. M. G. (2020). Realistic mathematics education in indonesia and recommendations for future implementation : A meta-analysis study. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 4(1), 17–27.
Tamur, M., Kurnila, V. S., Jehadus, E., Ndiung, S., Pereira, J., & Syaharuddin. (2021). Learning from the past : Meta-analysis of contextual teaching-learning of the past decade. International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application (IJECA), 4(1), 1–10.
Tamur, M., Kurnila, V. S., Jehadus, E., Nurjaman, A., Mandur, K., & Ndiung, S. (2021). The effect of the realistic mathematics education approach: Meta-analysis of the measured mathematical ability angle. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 550, 40–46.
Tamur, M., Mandur, K., & Pereira, J. (2021). Do combination learning models change the study effect size? a meta-analysis of contextual teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Experts (JEE), 4(1), 1–9.
Turmudi, & Maulida, A. (2019). Effect of the learning aproach of realistic mathematics education on problem solving and mathematics communications effectivity. 6th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2019), 677–681.
Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2017). The importance of seeing in mathematics communication. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12, 49–63.
Wijaya, A. (2012). Pendidikan matematika realistik suatu alternatif pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Graha Ilmu.
Yonandi, & Sumarmo, U. (2012). Mathematical communication ability and disposition (experiment with grade-11 students using contextual teaching with computer assissted). Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(2), 142–156.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i2.13562
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.