Islamic Religious Cues In Indonesian’s Political Debate

Fithrah Auliya Ansar

Abstract


Political debate is always used by politician in order to convince the hearer in winning their election. This research aim is to acknowledge the reader about how politician used his language in Political Debate. Many politicians use religious symbols in in performing themselves. Islam, the most majority religion in Indonesia, is always appeared in political debate through appearance or even untterance. This study can give the clearly explanation about Functional semiotic analysis related to language analysis. The theory of Functional analysis can be used in finding the voices of speaker in using their languages. The analysis focused on various features of Islamic symbols in politicians’ utterances and appearances related to the cultural performance. The additional theory about Bakhtinian dialogism was used in order to find the features which are related and different among the debaters. The result showed the features of islamic performance used by each speakers in political debate. The Islamic cues were not only found in non- verbal signs but also existed in verbal utterances. 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakhtin. Michael. 1989. "Discourse in Life and Discourse in Art (Concerning Sociological Poetics)." London: Longman

Boyd. Michael S. 2013. “Conceptual Metaphor and Personal Pronouns in political discourse:The US 2008 Presidential Debates” .Roma:University Roma Tre

Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistics Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

http://antroling.wikispaces.com/file/view/Duranti.Linguistic+Anthropology.pdf (downloaded on April, 1 2013)

_________.2001. Linguistics Anthropology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences Press. Elsevier Science Ltd.

Faruk. 2012. Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Lunssford. 2006. The Debate Within: Authority and the Discourse of Blindness. El Paso: University of Texas

Maybin. Janet. 1990. Children voices: talk, knowledge and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan Press

Sandarupa, S. 2009. Hilangnya bahasa politik yang puitik. Jakarta. KOMPAS

Sandarupa,S. 2013. the voice of a child constructing a moral society through poetic performance in Toraja. Makassar.

____________. 2009. Hilangnya bahasa politik yang puitik. Jakarta. KOMPAS

____________.2013. the voice of a child constructing a moral society through poetic performance in Toraja. Makassar.

Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon. 2001 Discourse and Intercultural Communication. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton, pp. 538-547. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Massachusetts.

Segers. 1978. The evaluation of literary text: an experimental investigation into the rationalization of value judgementswith reference to semiotics and esthetics of reception. Peter de Ridder Press

Todorov. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Manchester: Manchester UP

_______. 1985. Tata Sastra. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Valentina. Julia. 2011. The Types of argument structures used by Barack obama and John mccain in their presedential debate. Petra University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v9i1.419



English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, UIN Raden Intan Lampung is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. pISSN: 2083-6003, eISSN: 2580-1449.