Juridical Analysis of Judges' Decisions in Settling Grant Disputes from a Maslahah Perspective

Mohammad Yasir Fauzi; Muslim Muslim; Tri Winarsih

doi:10.24042/asas.v16i2.23925

Juridical Analysis of Judges' Decisions in Settling Grant Disputes from a Maslahah Perspective

Mohammad Yasir Fauzi , Muslim Muslim , Tri Winarsih

Abstract

Grants are tabarru' actions but often cause envy among the parties concerned or indirectly concerned. With several facts and cases regarding the withdrawal of grant assets for various reasons. As the case of grant disputes in the Kudus Religious Court with case number 314/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Kds. Jo. Number 372/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Smg. Jo. 658 K/Ag/2021. The purpose of this article is to know and analyse the judge's decision in resolving grant disputes from a maslahah perspective, seen from the type of research using library research or literature study, the primary data source is the decision of the Kudus Religious Court with case number 314/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Kds. Jo. Number 372/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Smg. Jo. 658 K/Ag/2021, while secondary legal sources are maslahah perspectives both from book sources, journal articles and so on, then data analysis using qualitative analysis techniques. The results of the study explain that the decisions of the courts of first instance and appeal are cancelled because this case is a case that should be the authority of the religious courts. As the decision of the panel of judges of the Kudus Religious Court Number 314/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Kds, and the Semarang Religious High Court in its decision Number 372/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Smg did not apply justice and expediency and even legal certainty. Article 49 of the Religious Courts Law is the basis for legal certainty in this case so that the party who filed the lawsuit did not get justice that the object of the case was the only property that had been owned and also in the two decisions did not achieve happiness for many parties, this is in line with the Supreme Court's decision Number 658 K/Ag/2021. Therefore, the decision of the Indonesian Supreme Court in examining and deciding the case is in accordance with the applicable legal theory and in accordance with the principle of kemashlahatan or maslahah theory in Islamic law.

Keywords: Grant; Maslahah; Tabarru' Act

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Shomad. Hukum Islam: Penormaan Prinsip Syari’ah Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

Ahmad Rofiq. Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.

“Aslinan Putusan Hakim Nomor 314/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Kds,” n.d.

Creswell, John W. and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE Publications., 2014. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf.

Endang Tri Wahyuni. “Pelaksanaan Pembatalan Hibah Tanah Oleh Pemberi Hibah (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No.95/Pdt.G/2004/PN.Smg).” Penelitian Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponogoro, Semarang, 2009. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17400/.

Faizah Bafadhal. “Analisis Tentang Hibah Dan Korelasinya Dengan Kewarisan Dan Pembatalan Hibah Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi 4, no. 1 (2013). https://www.neliti.com/publications/43291/analisis-tentang-hibah-dan-korelasinya-dengan-kewarisan-dan-pembatalan-hibah-men.

Ibnu Rusydi. “Hibah Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kewarisan Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 4, no. 2 (2017). https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/galuhjustisi/article/view/324.

Mardani. Hukum Kewarisan Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Moleong Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

Muhammad Amin. “Studi Komparasi Kekuatan Hukum Hibah Terhadap Anak Angkat Dalam Kehidupan Sosial-Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Jurnal JINNSA (Jurnal Interdipliner Sosiologi Agama) 1, no. 2 (2021). https://ejournal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/jinnsa/article/view/132.

Muhammad Helmi. “Muhammad Helmi. Konsep Keadilan Dalam Filsafat Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Mazahib 14, no. 2 (2015). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/212100977.pdf.

Mustamam, Mustamam. “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pencabutan Hibah Orang Tua Kepada Anak Kandungnya Dalam Perspektif Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan Nomor 1934/Pdt. G/2013/PA. Mdn).” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 20, no. 1 (2020). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Analisis+Yuridis+Tentang+Pencabutan+Hibah+Orang+Tua+Kepada+Anak+Kandungnya+Dalam+Perspektif+Perspektif+Kompilasi+Hukum+Islam+%28Studi+Putusan+Nomor+1934%2FPdt.+G%2F2013%2FPA.+Mdn%29&btnG=.

Niru Anita Sinaga. “Implementasi Hak Dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Perjanjian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 1 (2020). https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jihd/article/view/400.

Nor Mohammad Abdoeh. “Hibah Semua Harta Kepada Anak Angkat (Telaah Komparasi Antara Kuh Perdata Dan Khi).” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2020). https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/104827773/1434-libre.pdf?1691420530=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DHibah_Semua_Harta_Kepada_Anak_Angkat_Tel.pdf&Expires=1736135671&Signature=JZQlg4682UcEAaSISOljy2VsRbDB6B-TTn4N6iVFA35DZWMWpf32hCnijD8XATzaRWDreC6YtUPghRSSPL0qlpstFpXfZOYE54KPiDCrRBufn1BKH61PHyv4Jv1z6-D0nHVqFGIbOQGePMGrzTv6G-dmltJfBmre7RTOtVBUhAZKntIpnubW9C8dAR8KaxzJGjtG95MPSU1EHKjBKapZRZk1XRWErcfkI3tg7Q9x6wVVaDX1oj9tJH8wNlxHQBIXwk7YAwfDY-h-tD53Rx-1Lv1IFQ5agXJ2lgrXxFwblNbNouBHu9e1nnPxtDGB8dvA1S4-ferr39NA681VzrSz4Q__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA.

Nur Indah Utami, Ferryani Krisnawati, and Suryati Suryati. “Kedudukan Akta Hibah Bagi Anak Angkat Dari Pemberian Harta Orang Tua Angkat (Studi Putusan Nomor: 1637/Pdt. G/2019/Pa. Jp).” Wijayakusuma Law Review 5, no. 1 (2023). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Kedudukan+Akta+Hibah+Bagi+Anak+Angkat+Dari+Pemberian+Harta+Orang+Tua+Angkat+%28Studi+Putusan+Nomor%3A+1637%2FPdt.+G%2F2019%2FPa.+Jp%29&btnG=.

Rita Arini Apriani. Analisis Yurudis Terhadap Penolakan Permohonan Pembatalan Akta Hibah (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Pusat No. 436/Pdt.G/1999/PA.JP Dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 50/Pdt.G/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst). Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

“Salinan Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Agung Nomor 658 K/Ag/2021,” n.d.

“Salinan Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Nomor 372/Pdt.G/2020/Pta.Smg.,” n.d.

Satria Effendi. Problematika Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer: Analisis Yurisprudensi Dengan Pendekatan Ushuliyah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.

Selamat Lumban Gaol. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemakaian Nama Badan Hukum Perkumpulan Yang Terdapat Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Antara Satu Perkumpulan Dengan Perkumpulan Lainnya.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 2 (2020). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Penyelesaian+Sengketa+Pemakaian+Nama+Badan+Hukum+Perkumpulan+Yang+Terdapat+Persamaan+Pada+Pokoknya+Antara+Satu+Perkumpulan+Dengan+Perkumpulan+Lainnya&btnG=#d=gs_cit&t=1736124448843&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3AFQbXvJCvpQ0J%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3Den.

Shobirin, Shobirin. “Kompetensi Peradilan Agama Dalam Interpretasi Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Indonesia.” ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf 2, no. 1 (2015). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Kompetensi+Peradilan+Agama+Dalam+Interpretasi+Hukum+Keluarga+Islam+Di+Indonesia&btnG=.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 2021.

Tim Penyusun Kementrian Agama RI. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2018.

Vinna Lusiana. “Hukum Kewarisan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah: Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora 8, no. 2 (2022). https://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/ALWATZIKHOEBILLAH/article/view/2022.

Yoyok Prasetyo. Ekonomi Syariah. Bandung: CV. Aria Mandiri Group, 2018.

Zumiyati Sanu Ibrahim. “Implikasi Pembatalan Hibah (Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Islam).” Jurnal Al Himayah 5, no. 2 (2021). https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/2577/1686.