Reciprocal Teaching Learning: Is it Effective to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills and Scientific Process Skills?
Abstract
This study aimed to measure the effectiveness of using the reciprocal teaching learning model on the higher order thinking skills and science process skills of students. The research method used is a Quasi Experiment. Based on the results of the research calculated by the independent sample t-test from the post-test results of the control class of 66.97 and the experimental class of 77.71, it was obtained tcountmore than ttable (10.167 more than 1.996) and the percentage of observation results from the control class average of 73 and the mean The experimental class average is 76, so that the tcount value is greater than the ttable ((3.656 more than 1.996). Then the effectiveness of the reciprocal teaching model is known through the effect size test and the value of d = 0.5 is obtained. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the reciprocal model This teaching is effective in improving higher order thinking skills and science process skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
D. Purtrianasari and W. Wasitohadi, “Pengaruh Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas 5 Sd Negeri Cukil 01 Kecamatan Tengaran - Kabupaten Semarang,” Scholaria, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–77, 2015.
R. Yusuf, Sanusi, Maimun, E. Hayati, and I. Fajri, “Artikel Prosiding Seminar Nasional,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Reaktualisasi Konsep Kewarganegaraan Indonesia, 2019, pp. 185–200.
W. Wahyu, R. Rusmansyah, and A. Sholahuddin, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Self efficacy siswa menggunakan Model Creatuve Problem Solving Pada Materi Sistem Koloid,” Jurnak Vidya Karya, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2017.
K. C. Suryandari, S. Sajidan, S. B. Rahardjo, Z. K. Prasetyo, and S. Fatimah, “Project-based Science Learning and Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Literacy Skill and Creative Thinking,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. XXXVII, no. 3, pp. 345–355, 2018.
A. Setyadi and A. A. Saefudin, “Pengembangan modul matematika dengan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk siswa kelas VII SMP,” Pythagoras J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2019, doi: 10.21831/pg.v14i1.16771.
D. Putri, Sri Diana, Djamas, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Problem-Based Learning,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 125, 2017, doi: 10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v6i1.648.
M. . Nur and A. Madkur, “Teachers’ Voices on the 2013 Curriculum for English Instructional Activities,” Int. J. English Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 119–134, 2014.
L. Lutfianannisak and U. Sholihah, “Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Komposisi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika,” J. Tadris Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.21274/jtm.2018.1.1.1-8.
A. H. Yanti, “Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Lubuklinggau,” J. Pendidik. Mat. Raflesia, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–129, 2017.
L. Suswati, L. Yuliati, and N. Mufti, “Pengaruh Integrative Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa Lis,” J. Pendidik. sains, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2015.
Q. Fariyani, A. Rusilowati, and Sugianto, “Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41–49, 2015.
E. Dewa, Maria Ursula Jawa Mukin, and Oktavina Pandango, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Minat dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Fisika,” JARTIKA J. Ris. Teknol. dan Inov. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 351–359, 2020, doi: 10.36765/jartika.v3i2.288.
H. Aktamis and O. Ergin, “The Effect of Scientific Process Skills Education on Students’ Scientific Creativity, Science Attitudes and Academic Achievements,” AsiaPacific Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 21, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/61875613?accountid=14719.
H. El-Senousy and J. Alquda, “The Effect of Flipped Classroom strategy using Blackboard Mashup tools in enhancing achievement and Self– Regulated learning skills of university students,” World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 144, 2017, doi: 10.18844/wjet.v6i3.1974.
N. Mustaffa, Z. Ismail, Z. Tasir, and M. N. H. M. Said, “The Impacts of Implementing Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Mathematics: A Review of Literature,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2513.
H. S. Ramadhani, “Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran SCL (Student Centered Learning) dan TCL (Teacher Centered Learning) pada Motivasi Instrinsik & Ekstrinsik Mahasiswa Psikologi UNTAG Surabaya Angkatan Tahun 2014-2015,” Pers. J. Psikol. Indones., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 66–74, 2017.
M. Syukri, H. Lilia, and M. M. T. Subahan, “Pendidikan STEM dalam Entrepreneurial Science Thinking ‘ESciT’: Satu Perkongsian Pengalaman dari UKM untuk Aceh,” Aceh Dev. Int. Conf., no. 26-28 MARCH, pp. 105–112, 2013.
Uslan dan Nuriyah, “Model Student Centered Learning (SCL) di Sekolah Dasar (SD) Yang Inovatif Terintegrasi Pembelajaran Terpadu,” J. Pendas Mahakam, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2018.
D. Effendi and A. Wahidy, “Pengembangan Kreativitas Inovatif melalui Pembelajaran Digital,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 999–1015.
M. Fathurrohman, Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif: Alternatif Desain Pembelajaran yang Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2015.
A. Shoimin, 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulim 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2017.
Z. Aqib, Model-Model,Media Dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: CV Yrama Widya, 2014.
U. A.F, Masrukan, and A. R, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Model Taba Berbantuan Geometer’s Sketchpad,” Kreano J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2014, doi: 10.15294/kreano.v5i1.3279.
M. Okkinga, R. van Steensel, A. J. S. van Gelderen, and P. J. C. Sleegers, “Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low-achieving adolescents. The importance of specific teacher skills,” J. Res. Read., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 20–41, 2018, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12082.
A. Zendler and S. Reile, “The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 58, no. December 2017, pp. 132–144, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.008.
T. Andira, B. Santoso, and M. Yusup, “Penerapan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik pada materi bangun datar segiempat Applying of reciprocal teaching learning model viewed from students ’ mathematical reasoning on quadrilateral mat,” Pythagoras, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 88–98, 2018.
D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, and T. Nuriah, “The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching, Student Facilitator and Explaining and Learning Independence on Mathematical Learning Results by Controlling the Initial Ability of Students,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2018, doi: 10.12973/iejme/3838.
T. T. Wu and A. C. Chen, “Combining e-books with mind mapping in a reciprocal teaching strategy for a classical Chinese course,” Comput. Educ., vol. 116, pp. 64–80, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.012.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.8675
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.