SYLLABUS DESIGN FOR ENGLISH COURSES

Bambang Irfani

Abstract


The planning of courses including designing curriculum and syllabus is often ignored in English language teaching and teacher training.  Harmer (2000) states that decisions about course content are very often not taken by teachers, but by some higher authority.  Even many institutions present the syllabus in terms of the main textbook to be used - by a certain date, teachers are expected to have covered a certain number of units in the book.  At the same time teachers are often provided with a list of supplementary material and activities available. Yet, the graduates of such programs as English teacher training are often required to carry out course design task without having received sufficient training to do so.  As a matter of fact, course design requires specialized expertise which can be gained through learning and practice.  Designing courses is unlike preparing one's own teaching as it should be understood by others who will use the design.  Therefore, it is very urgent to equip the English teachers with the basic competence of course design.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, L.G. (1976). Where do we go from here? A reconsideration of some basic assumptions affecting course design. English Language Teach¬ing, 30(2), 89-103.

Brown, H.D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Brumfit, C.J., & Johnson, K. (Eds.). (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Candlin, C., & Murphy, D. (Eds.) (1986). Language learning tasks (Vol. 7, Lancaster Practical Papers). London: Pergamon.

Chastain. K. (1976). Developing second language skills: Tigory t,- practice. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Dubin, F., & E. Olshtain. (1986). Course design: Developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2000). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Krahnke, K.J. (1987) Approaches to Syllabus for Foreign Language Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Krahnke, K.J., & Knowles, M. (1984). The basis for belief: What ESL teachers believe about language teaching and why. Paper presented at the 18th annual meeting of Teacher of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Houston, March, 1984.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Lambert, W., & Tucker, G.R. (1972). The bilingual education of children. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Long, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Class oriented research in second language acquisi¬tion. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Lozano, F., & Sturtevant, J. (1981). Life styles. New York: Longman.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1982). Method: Approach, Design, and Procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 153-168.

Widdowson, H.G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wilkins, D.A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wolfson, N., & Judd, E. (1983). Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Yalden, J. (1943). The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design. and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v6i1.517



English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, UIN Raden Intan Lampung is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. pISSN: 2083-6003, eISSN: 2580-1449.