Exploration of students computational thinking abilities in solving sequences and series problems based on learning style
Abstract
Computational thinking skills play an important role in the 21st century to help students solve math problems. One way in which students' problem-solving abilities are influenced by learning style. This research aims to explore the computational thinking abilities of students studied according to visual (V), auditory (A) and kinesthetics (K) learning styles. This research uses a qualitative method through a case study model. The researcher applies data collection instruments in the form of test questions, learning style questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the test results and the learning style questionnaire, the researcher selected 2 students from each learning style. The results of this study revealed that students with a visual style showed indicators of abstraction, pattern recognition, algorithmic thinking, and generalization. Furthermore, in students with an auditory learning style, indicators of abstraction, decomposition, pattern recognition, algorithmic thinking and generalization emerge. In kinesthetics learning style students, indicators of abstraction, pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking emerge. Based on this, the conclusion obtained is that the difference in students' learning styles has an impact on indicators of computational thinking ability in solving problems related to sequences and series.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afifah, R. N., & Apriyono, F. (2023). Analysis of students’ computational thinking skills on social arithmetic material in terms of adversity quotient. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 14(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v14i2.45273
Alfauziyya, F. M., & Masduki, M. (2023, June). Level of student’s proportional reasoning in solving algebra based on learning style. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2727, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141431
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 47–57.
Ayu Shofa, D., Khabibah, S., & Fardah, D. K. (2023). Profile of student’s mathematical connection in aritmethic sequences and series based on learning styles. MATHEdunesa, 10(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n3.p734-754
Azizah, N. I., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2022). Computational thinking process of high school students in solving sequences and series problems. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v8i1.17917
Azizah, R., Awi, A., Asyari, S., & Siman, R. (2021). Mathematics problem-solving ability based on learning style of junior high school. International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM 2021), 611(ICoESM), 27–33.
Bebras Indonesia. (2023). Pengumuman Hasil Bebras Indonesia Challenge 2023. https://bebras.or.id/v3/pengumuman-hasil-bebras-indonesia-challenge-2023/
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016). Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. EDULEARN16 Proceedings, 1(June), 4725–4733. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.2136
Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2015). Computational thinking: a guide for teachers. Computing At School, October 2018, 18.
De Porter, B., dan Hernacki, M. (2013). Quantum learning: membiasakan belajar nyaman. Bandung: Kaifa.
Firmansyah, M. A., & Syarifah, L. L. (2023). Mathematical problem solving ability in view of learning styles. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i1.7217
Gunawan, Supriatna, Setyaningsih, E., & Fera Apriana, R. (2021). Mathematics problem solving on linear system of two variables. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1778(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012027
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W. S., Sayuti, M., Rahmaniati, R., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students: how they solve PISA-oriented mathematics problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012012
Lee, S. W. Y., Tu, H. Y., Chen, G. L., & Lin, H. M. (2023). Exploring the multifaceted roles of mathematics learning in predicting students’ computational thinking competency. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00455-2
Maharani, S., Kholid, M. N., NicoPradana, L., & Nusantara, T. (2019). Problem solving in the context of infinty: Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p109-116
Masduki, M., Savitri, D., & Khotimah, R. P. (2023). Students’ visual reasoning ability in solving quadratic function in terms of learning style. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(3), 576-591. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i3.13547
Murtiyasa, B., & Wulandari, S. (2022). Problem solving ability according to polya on system of linear equations in two variables based on student learning styles. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 9(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v9i2.26328
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
Pratiwi, G., Sujadi, I., & Slamet, I. (2021). Mathematics problem solving ability: an analysis based on IDEAL problem solving viewed from learning style. Proceedings of the International Conference of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (I-CMME 2021), 597, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.014
Prayogo, M. (2022). High schools’ students mathematics communication ability: learning style perspective. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 3(1), 58–66. http://jelmar.wisnuwardhana.ac.id/index.php/jelmar/indexhttps://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v3i1.74https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v3i1.74
Purwasih, R., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Ishartono, N. (2024). Computational thinking on concept pattern number: A study learning style Kolb. Jurnal Elemen, 10(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.23056
Ramadhana, B. R., Prayitno, S., Wulandari, N. P., & Subarinah, S. (2022). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis pada materi barisan dan deret berdasarkan gaya belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 4(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpmj.v4i1.23025
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Florence, KY: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Developing assessment instruments of PISA model to measure students’ problem-solving skills and scientific literacy in junior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468
Sartini, N. K. (2023). Menggeneralisasi pola bilangan dan jumlah pada barisan aritmatika dan geometri. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/asesmenpedia/public-subject/basic-competence/5806a6c3-d199-4a6e-9915-37e5317655c9
Sheromova, T. S., Khuziakhmetov, A. N., Kazinets, V. A., Sizova, Z. M., Buslaev, S. I., & Borodianskaia, E. A. (2020). Learning styles and development of cognitive skills in mathematics learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8538
Selby, C. (2013). Computational thinking: the developing definition. ITiCSE Conference 2013, 5–8.
Selby, C. C. (2015). Relationships: computational thinking, pedagogy of programming, and bloom’s taxonomy. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 09-11-November-2015, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818315
Septia, T., & Nazilah, I. (2023). Analysis of Student errors in solving spldv problems based on newman’s theory. Noumerico: Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 1(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v1i2.4117
Sholichah, A., & Setyaningsih, R. (2024, January). Analysis of student’s metacognitive ability in solving two-variable linear equation system (TVLES) problems review from learning style. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2926, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183744
Sugianto, A. (2021). Kuesioner Gaya Belajar Siswa. Repo-Dosen.Ulm.Ac.Id. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/26041/Angket Gaya Belajar 2021.pdf?sequence=1
Sulisawati, D. N., Lutfiyah, L., Murtinasari, F., & Sukma, L. (2019). Differences of visual, auditorial, kinesthetic students in understanding mathematics problems. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1385
Supiarmo, M. G., Hadi, H. S., & Tarmuzi, T. (2022). Students computational thinking process in solving PISA questions in terms of problem solving abilities. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i1.p01-11
Trisnaningtyas, N. O., & Khotimah, R. P. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis dalam menyelesaikan soal akm ditinjau dari gaya belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 2714. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5662
Tsai, M. C., & Tsai, C. W. (2018). Applying online externally-facilitated regulated learning and computational thinking to improve students’ learning. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 811-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0542-z
Veronica, A. R., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Wiryanto, W. (2022). Primary school students’ computational thinking in solving mathematics problems based on learning style. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i1.10378
Vourletsis, I., & Politis, P. (2020). Effects of a computational thinking experimental course on students’ perceptions of Their Problem-Solving Skills. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383923.3383935
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zulfah, N. A. A., Kusumaningsih, W., & Endahwuri, D. (2021). Profil kemampuan penalaran matematis dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. JIPMat, 6(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v6i2.9495
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v7i2.21971
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Desimal: Jurnal Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
