Exploration of students' computational thinking skills in solving fractional number problems judging from learning style
Abstract
Computational thinking skills play an important role in the 21st century in helping students solve mathematical problems. One of the problem-solving abilities of students is influenced by learning style. The purpose of this study is to explore students' computational thinking skills through visual (V), auditory (A), and kinesthetic (K) learning styles. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. This study uses data collection instruments such as test questions, learning-style questionnaires, and interviews. Before being used, the test questions were validated by two mathematics education experts and tested on five grade V students. Using the test results and the learning style questionnaires, the researcher selected three visual students, one auditory student, and two kinesthetic students. Based on the findings of the research, learning style does not affect students' computational thinking capacity. Students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles can meet all indicators of computational thinking: abstraction, pattern recognition, algorithmic thinking, and generalization.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adawiyah, S. S., Auliya, Z. U., Pamungkas, M. D., Tidar, U., & Tengah, J. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal persamaan diferensial ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. MATH LOCUS: Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.31002/mathlocus.v2i2.1933
Alfi Muyassaroh, K., & masduki. (2023). Profil berpikir aljabar siswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan generalisasi dan berpikir dinamis ditinjau dari gaya kognitif Fi-Fd. FIBONACCI :Journal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 9(1), 27–42. https://dx.doi.org/10.24853/fbc.9.1.27-42
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Student activities in solving mathematics problems with a computational thinking using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308
Annisa Nur Fauziyah, & Masduki, M. (2023). Eksplorasi kemampuan berpikir aljabar siswa sekolah dasar dalam menyelesaikan soal manipulasi numerik. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v8i1.3626
Chen, Y. Y., Su, S. W., Chen, L. X., Liao, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2023). Effect of learning style on non-programmed computational thinking activities. Engineering Proceedings, 55(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055040
Chookaew, S., Howimanporn, S., & Hutamarn, S. (2020). Investigating students ’ computational thinking through stem robot-based learning activities. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(6), 1366 - 1371. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj0506164
Fang, X., Ng, D. T. K., Tam, W. T., & Yuen, M. (2023). Integrating computational thinking into primary mathematics: A case study of fraction lessons with Scratch programming activities. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231181963
Gillott, L., Joyce-Gibbons, A., & Hidson, E. (2020). Exploring and comparing computational thinking skills in students who take GCSE Computer Science and those who do not. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(4), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i4.77
Hinterplattner, S., Skog, J. S., Kröhn, C., & Sabitzer, B. (2020). The children’s congress: a benefit to all levels of schooling by strengthening computational thinking. International Journal of Learning, 6(4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.6.4.241-246
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W. S., Sayuti, M., Rahmaniati, R., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students: how they solve PISA-Oriented Mathematics Problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012012
Khishaaluhussaniyyati, M., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas 10 smk dalam menyelesaikan soal hots materi barisan dan deret aritmetika ditinjau dari self regulated learning. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 905–923. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2170
Kholid, M. N., Swastika, A., Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Lam, T. T., Maharani, S., Ikram, M., Murniasih, T. R., Majid, Wijaya, A. P., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Hierarchy of students’ reflective thinking levels in mathematical problem solving. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6883
Krogh, S., Annette, N., Bjerke, H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational thinking in the primary mathematics classroom : a systematic review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5
Kusuma Ardi, S. D., & Masduki, M. (2023). Eksplorasi berpikir aljabar siswa kelas 5 dalam menyelesaikan soal pemodelan. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 6(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2023.6.1.85-100
Liu, H., Wu, Z., Lu, Y., & Zhu, L. (2023). Exploring the balance between computational thinking and learning motivation in elementary programming education: an empirical study with game-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Games, 15(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3143701
Milicic, G., Wetzel, S., & Ludwig, M. (2020). Generic tasks for algorithms. Future Internet, 12(9), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12090152
Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. (2020). Teacher implementation profiles for integrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and science instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3161–3188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10115-5
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Rodríguez-martínez, J. A., González-calero, J. A., & Sáez-lópez, M. (2022). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch : an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Rosida, A., & Masduki, M. (2023). Exploring student algebraic thinking in solving math problems in terms of kolb’s learning style. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 6(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol6iss1pp62-72
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Taslibeyaz, E., Kursun, E., & Karaman, S. (2020). How to develop computational thinking: a systematic review of empirical studies. Informatics in Education, 19(4), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2020.30
Utami, I. D., & Masduki, M. (2023). Student’S visual reasoning in solving linear equations in terms of learning style. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i1.7171
Veronica, A. R., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Wiryanto, W. (2022). Primary school students’ computational thinking in solving mathematics problems based on learning style. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i1.10378
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v7i2.21878
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Desimal: Jurnal Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.