Reconstruct the Class Assessment Strategy: Promoting the 21st-Century Learning

Undang Rosidin, Novi haryanti, Haditya Aprita Lora, Viyanti Viyanti

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to reconstruct the class assessment to promote 21st-century learning. The meaning of reconstructing class assessment is the advanced assessment that can realize the purpose of 21st-century learning which is the ability of argumentation, critical, and creative thinking skills. The advanced assessment in this research used the model of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI). This research is a quasi-experimental study that uses a pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design. The research population is 12th-grade students of senior high school on Bandar Lampung. Based on data analysis, it was revealed that the classroom assessment strategy with continuous assessment using the ADI model can be used as a reference to be able to practice 21st-century life skills including argumentation, critical thinking, and creative skills.

Keywords


the Class Assessment Strategy, 21st-Century Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


BNSP. (2006). Panduan PenyusunanKurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Badan StandarNasional Pendidikan.

Hubert, S. Latifah, A. Anugrah, A. Saregar, Misbah, and K. Jermsittiparsert, (2019) "Approaching Problem-Solving Skills of Momentum and Impulse Phenomena Using Context and Problem-Based Learning," Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 1217

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). in Biology ARTICLE Argument-Driven Inquiry To Promote AB ? of the Understanding Important Concepts & Practices O ?... students need The American Argument Driven. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8),465–472.

Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Southerland, S.A. (2012). Using laboratory activities that emphasize argumentation and argument to help high school students learn how to engage in scientific inquiry and understand the nature of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the annual international conference of the Nat. In The Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Indianapolis, ID (p. 11).

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative Assessment and Next-Generation Assessment Systems: Are We Losing an Opportunity? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

T. Rahayu and K. Osman, (2019) “Knowledge Level And Self-Confidence On The Computational Thinking Skills Among Science Teacher Candidates,” Jurna Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 117–126

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.

Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.

Parahat, R., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman. 2013. Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika Menggunakan On going Assessment Teknik IF-AT. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika.

Tsagari, D. (2011). Investigating the ‘assessment literacy’ of EFL state school teachers in Greece. In D. Tsagari& I. Csépes (Eds.), Classroom-based language assessment (pp.169-190). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Purpura, J. Liu, H., Tsutagawa, F.S, Woodson, S. (2014). Tracking the Development of Learning Outcomes in a Learning-Oriented Approach to Classroom-Based L2 Assessment. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium (June, Amsterdam).

Torrance, H. &. Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University

Wartono, J. Takaria, J. R. Batlolona, S. Gruscher, M. N. Hudha, and Y Jayanti, “Inquiry-Discovery Empowering High OrderThinking Skills And Scientific Literacy On Substance Pressure Topic,” Jurna Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 140, 2018.

Angelo, T. 1995. Beginning the dialogue: thoughts on promoting critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology. Vol 2 (1).

Setiawan, A., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman. 2019. The Effectiveness of Ongoing Assessment on Physics Learning Improving Students Critical Thinking Skills. International Education Research. Vol 2(2).

Rosidin, U., Distrik, I. W., &Herlina, K. 2018. The Development of Assessment for learning Science to Improve Student’s Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy. Vol. 1 (1). 61-67.

Viyanti, Cari, Sunarno, W., &Prasetyo, Z. K. 2016. AnalisisArgumentasiMateriTerapung dan Tenggelam. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keguruan. Vol 2 (2).

Joslin, Cara. 2010. Teaching for Understanding: Ongoing Assessment. Harvard University Graduet School of Education and Project Hero.

Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50-62.

Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 5.

Abdurrahman, S. A., &Umam, R. (2018). The Effect Of Feedback As Soft Scaffolding On Ongoing Assessment Toward The Quantum Physics Concept Mastery Of The Prospective Physics Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 16-22.

Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: the use of ‘Authentic self-and peer- assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875-891.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2006). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved.

Simon Shirley, Sibel Erduranb, dan Jonathan Osborne.2006. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Researchand Development in The Science Classroom International Journal of Science Education. 28 (2–3)235–260.

Chan-Choong Foong dan Esther G. S. Daniel. 2010. Assessing Students' Arguments Made in SocioScientificContexts:The Considerations of Structural Complexity and The Depth of Content Knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 9. 1120–1127

Listiana, Abdurrahman, A. Suyatna, and P. Nuangchalerm, “The Effect Of Newtonian Dynamics STEM-Integrated Learning Strategy To Increase Scientific Literaci Of Senior High School Students.,” Jurna Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2019.

Z. S. Pamungkas, N. S. Aminah, and F. N. Rosyid, “Students Crictical Thinking Skill in Solving Scientific Literacy using A Metacognitive Test Based On Scientific Literacy,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 161, 2018.

Ledward, BC, & Hirata. (2011). An overview of 21st century skills. Summary of 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers, by Pasific Policy Research Center. Honolulu: Kamehame Schools-Research and Evaluation.

Ennis, R. H. 2011. The Nature of Criticall Thinking: An Outline of Criticall Thinking Disposition and Abilities. Chicago: University of Illinois.

A. Malik, Y. Nuraeni, A. Samsudin, and Sutarno, “Creative Thinking Skills of Students On Harmonics Vibration Using Models Student Facilitator And Explaining (SFAE),” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2019.

Wang, A. Y. 2011. Contexts of Creative Thinking: A Comparison on Creative Performance of Student Teachers in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of International and Cross-Cultural Studies, Vol. 2, (1). 56-68.

Rosidin, U., Distrik, I. W., &Herlina, K. 2018. The Development of assessment for learning Science to Improve Student’s Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy. Vol. 1 (1). 61-67.

Silver, E. A. 1997. Fostering Creativity Through Instruction Rich In Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. ZDM International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29(3).

Siswono, T. 2011. Level of Student’s Creative Thinking in Clasroom Mathematics. Educational Research and Review, 6(7). ISSN 1990-3839. Hal. 548 – 553.

Hake, R. R., Relationship of Individual Student Normalized Learning Gains in Mechanics with Gender, High-School Physics, and Pretest Scores on Mathematics and Spatial Visualization. Physics Education Research Conference.; Boise, Idaho, 2002.

C. V. Aufschnaiter et al., “Arguing ToLearn and Learning to Argue: CaseStudies of How Students’ ArgumentationRelates to Their Scientific Knowledge,Journal of Research In Science Teachingvol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–131, 2008.

Demircioglu, T., &Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratoryinstruction. Educational Science: Theory &Practice, 15(1), 267–283.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257.

Kadayifci, H., Atasoy, B., &Akkus, H. (2012). The Correlation Between the Flaws Students Define in an Argument and their Creative and Critical Thinking Abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 802–806.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i1.6056

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2020 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.