Exploring the relationship between students' attitudes and fraction sense proficiency across lower secondary grades

Parmjit Singh; Nur Aida Asyikin Binti Salim; Teoh Sian Hoon; Nurul Akmal Md Nasir

doi:10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.21776

Exploring the relationship between students' attitudes and fraction sense proficiency across lower secondary grades

Parmjit Singh, Nur Aida Asyikin Binti Salim, Teoh Sian Hoon, Nurul Akmal Md Nasir

Abstract

Understanding fractions is a critical mathematical skill necessary for more advanced mathematical concepts and applications. However, many students struggle with fraction sense, which is the foundational understanding and flexible use of fractions. This study aims to explore the relationship between students' attitudes toward learning fractions and their proficiency in fraction sense in lower secondary grades. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 296 students aged 13 to 15 using the Fraction Sense Test (FST) and the Attitudes Towards Learning Fractions Questionnaire (ATLF). The study found that students consistently struggled with fractional concepts, achieving low scores across all grades. Nevertheless, a significant, though diminishing, relationship was observed between positive attitudes towards fractions and fraction sense proficiency from Secondary One to Secondary Three. These findings suggest the need to integrate meaningful fraction learning approaches to maintain students' positive attitudes, thereby improving their overall mathematical competence.

Keywords

attitude, fraction sense, learning, making sense, mathematics education

Full Text:

PDF

References

B. Wong, Y.-L. T. Chiu, Ó. M. Murray, and J. Horsburgh, “End of the road? The career intentions of under-represented STEM students in higher education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 51, 2022.

S. L. Ong and J. P. W. Ling, “Factors influencing pre-university students’ interests towards STEM programs and careers,” in 2020 IEEE 8th R10 humanitarian technology conference (R10-HTC), 2020, pp. 1–6, doi : 10.1109/R10-HTC49770.2020.9357019.

R. S. Siegler and A. A. Pyke, “Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions.,” Dev. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1994-2004, 2013, doi : 10.1037/a0031200.

J. L. Booth and K. J. Newton, “Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman?,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 247–253, 2012, doi : 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.07.001.

F. Fennell and K. Karp, “Fraction sense: Foundational understandings,” J. Learn. Disabil., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 648–650, 2017, doi : 10.1177/0022219416662030.

R. E. Reys and D.-C. Yang, “Relationship between computational performance and number sense among sixth-and eighth-grade students in Taiwan,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 225–237, 1998.

S. J. Lamon, “Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research,” Second Handb. Res. Math. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 629–667, 2007.

A. McIntosh, B. J. Reys, and R. E. Reys, “A proposed framework for examining basic number sense,” Subject Learning in the Primary Curriculum, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2-3, 1992.

T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, and T. A. Romberg, “Toward a Unified Science of Personality Coherence,” Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 253-262, 2015, doi: 10.1037/cap0000022.

M. J. Behr, G. Harel, T. Post, and R. Lesh, Rational Numbers: Toward A Semantic Analysis-Emphasis On The Operator Construct. Routledge : Britania Raya, 2012.

A. Kartal and N. Pirasa, “Examination of Fractional Number Sense in Eight Graders with High Academic Performance,” Educ. Q. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1-13, 2022.

G. Bruin-Muurling, “The development of proficiency in the fraction domain: Affordances and constraints in the curriculum,” Ph. D, thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Belanda, 2010. [Online]. Available : https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/2840528/692951.

P. Singh, T. S. Hoon, N. A. M. Nasir, C. T. Han, S. M. Rasid, and J. B. Z. Hoong, “Obstacles faced by students in making sense of fractions,” Eur. J. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 34-51, 2021.

R. J. Daker, S. U. Gattas, H. M. Sokolowski, A. E. Green, and I. M. Lyons, “First-year students’ mathematics anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of mathematics ability,” NPJ Sci. Learn., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2021.

J. Namkung and L. Fuchs, “Remediating difficulty with fractions for students with mathematics learning difficulties.,” Learn. Disabil. A Multidiscip. J., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 36–48, 2019.

P. Singh, “Understanding the concepts of proportion and ratio constructed by two grade six students,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 271–292, 2000.

P. Clarkson and M. Hannula, “Students’ motivation and attitudes towards mathematics and its study,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mathematical Education, 2008, pp. 399–401.

S. Hwang and T. Son, “Students’ attitude toward mathematics and its relationship with mathematics achievement.,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 272–280, 2021, doi: 10.20448/journal.509.2021.83.272.280.

D. Macher, I. Papousek, K. Ruggeri, and M. Paechter, “Statistics anxiety and performance: blessings in disguise,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01116.

X. Ma and J. Xu, “Determining the causal ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics,” Am. J. Educ., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 256–280, 2004.

J. K. Mensah, M. Okyere, and A. Kuranchie, “Student attitude towards mathematics and performance: Does the teacher attitude matter,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 132–139, 2013.

B. Quinn and A. D. Jadav, “Causal relationship between attitude and achievement for elementary grade mathematics and reading,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 366–372, 1987.

Y. D. Arthur, C. S. K. Dogbe, and S. K. Asiedu-Addo, “Enhancing performance in mathematics through motivation, peer assisted learning, and teaching quality: The mediating role of student interest,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp 1-13, 2022.

C. Hosking, Exploring Changes In Pupil Motivation And Attitudes Towards Mathematics As Pupils Move Up Through One Secondary School. University of Wales Trinity Saint David : United Kingdom, 2022.

S. Getenet, R. Cantle, P. Redmond, and P. Albion, “Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2024.

U. Istiqomah and E. Prihatnani, “Peningkatan hasil belajar dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika melalui joyful learning,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 471–482, 2019.

Y. Purnomo, “Pengaruh sikap siswa pada pelajaran matematika dan kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika,” JKPM (Jurnal Kaji. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2017.

S. H. Khotimah, “Pengaruh kemampuan menghafal al-qur’an dan sikap siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika,” Hikmah J. Islam. Stud., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2020.

J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2013.

R. V Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970.

E. Fennema and J. A. Sherman, “Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 324–326, 1976.

C. León-Mantero, J. C. Casas-Rosal, C. Pedrosa-Jesús, and A. Maz-Machado, “Measuring attitude towards mathematics using Likert scale surveys: The weighted average,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1-15, 2020, doi : 10.1371/journal.pone.0239626.

I. Ajzen, Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood cliffs : New York, 1980.

C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.

P. Parrish and J. Linder-VanBerschot, “Cultural dimensions of learning: Addressing the challenges of multicultural instruction,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2010.

J. Piaget and M. Cook, The origins of intelligence in children, International Universities Press : New York, 1952.

I. Kliziene, A. Paskovske, G. Cizauskas, A. Augustiniene, B. Simonaitiene, and R. Kubiliunas, “The impact of achievements in mathematics on cognitive ability in primary school,” Brain Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1-17, 2022.

J. Piaget and R. Garcia, Psychogenesis and the history of science. Columbia : University Press, 1989.

P. G. Sidney, C. A. Thompson, C. Fitzsimmons, and J. M. Taber, “Children’s and adults’ mathematics attitudes are differentiated by number type,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220973.2019.1653815.

J. M. Furner and C. Higgins, “Empowering teacher leadership to address mathematics anxiety in today’s schools,” Transformations, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–23, 2019.

J. E. Kihwele and J. Mkomwa, “Promoting students’ interest and achievement in mathematics through ‘King and Queen of Mathematics’ initiative,” J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 115–133, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0083.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.21776

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me