Learning Obstacle in the Introduction to Number: A Critical Study Within Didactical Design Research Framework

Ikbal Pauji, Didi Suryadi, Mohd Afifi Bin Bahurudin Setambah, Agus Hendriyanto

Abstract


This research unveils a profound exploration of learning obstacles experienced by elementary school students in understanding the concept of numbers, particularly in recognizing numbers zero to ten, including their notations. This study employs a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. It sheds light on students' comprehension of the meaning of numbers and numerals, identifying five types of learning obstacles: ontogenic psychological obstacles, ontogenic conceptual obstacles, ontogenic instrumental obstacles, didactical obstacles, and epistemological obstacles. Acting as the primary instrument, the researcher undertakes the entire research process using diagnostic assessments and interview guidelines, from data collection to reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The findings illustrate variations in students' understanding of the meaning and notation of numbers, with the five learning obstacles manifesting in diverse contexts. This analysis is based on students' responses to diagnostic assessments and in-depth interviews. The insights gained underscore the necessity for didactic designs that accommodate concrete aspects, emotional engagement of students, and the evaluation of instructional materials to enhance the understanding of numerical concepts. The research implications include recommendations for developing effective didactic designs to address the identified learning obstacles.

Keywords


didactical design research, learning obstacle, mathematics learning, number recognition

Full Text:

PDF

References


D. Suryadi, Landasan filosofis penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR). Bandung: Gapura Press, 2019.

A. Sarah, “Peran Guru PAK Sebagai Fasilitator Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Literasi,” Fidei J. Teol. Sist. dan Prakt., vol. I, no. 2, pp. 232–249, 2018.

S. Sudirman et al., “Praktik Penilaian Guru Pendidikan Sains antara Keyakinan atau Pengetahuan Guru? Perspektif Filsafat,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. VII, no. 3, pp. 2018–2025, 2022.

L. D. Pratama and W. Lestari, “Pengaruh Pelatihan Terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Matematika,” J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 278–285, 2020.

I. P. Suardipa, “Sociocultural-Revolution Ala Vygotsky dalam Konteks Pembelajaran,” Widya Kumara J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. I, no. 2, pp. 48–58, 2020.

H. Budiono and A. Utomo, “Strategi Guru dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis (Critical Thinking) pada Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” ADI WIDYA, J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. V, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2020.

D. K. Yestiani and N. Zahwa, “Peran Guru dalam Pembelajaran pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Fondatia, vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2020.

H. Karso, Pembelajaran Matematika di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2014.

E. Kosasih, Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

D. Suryadi, Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR) dan implementasinya. Bandung: Gapura Press, 2019.

Y. Chevallard and M. Bosch, Didactic Transposition in Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. London: Springer, Dordrecht, 2014.

J. Boaler and C. Dweck, Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016.

I. M. Rusmana, “Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika,” Indones. J. Educ. …, vol. I, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2021.

I. Pauji et al., “Analysis of Context Utilization in Mathematics Learning Based on Teacher Competency,” vol. IX, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2023.

A. Hendriyanto, D. Suryadi, J. A. Dahlan, and D. Juandi, “Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. XIX, no. 2, pp. 1-13, 2023.

NCTM, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. New York : NCTM, 2000.

A. N. Phafiandita, A. Permadani, A. S. Pradani, and M. I. Wahyudi, “Urgensi Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Kelas,” JIRA J. Inov. dan Ris. Akad., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2022.

M. Hariyani, T. Herman, D. Suryadi, and S. Prabawanto, “Exploration of Student Learning Obstacles in Solving Fraction Problems in Elementary School,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. VIII, no. 3, pp. 505–515, 2022.

I. Fauzi and R. Arini, “Desain Didaktis Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Pecahan Campuran di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Didakt. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2021.

I. Fauzi and D. Suryadi, “Didactical Design Research untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru di Sekolah Dasar,” Inven. J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 58-68, 2020.

U. Nurjanah and D. L. Hakim, “Number sense siswa pada materi bilangan,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat. Sesiomadika 2019, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 1174–1182, 2019.

E. Yayuk, Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Malang: UMM Press, 2019.

A. Siregar, Z. Rahmayani, N. Safira, A. Rahmah, Rahmaida, and H. P. Ritonga, “Penjumlahan, Pengurangan, Pembagian, Perkalian Pada Operasi Bilangan Bulat,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 6248–6259, 2023.

N. Nurjannah, D. Danial, and F. Fitriani, “Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar Pada Materi Operasi Hitung Bilangan Bulat Negatif,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. XIII, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2019.

L. A. Nurani et al., “Analisis Learning Obstacle Siswa Pada Materi Pecahan Senilai Di Kelas Iv Sekolah Dasar,” J. Elem. Educ., vol. IV, no. 5, pp. 673-683, 2021.

S. M. Rohmah, D. Darta, and R. I. Anggraeni, “Analisis Learning Obstacles pada Materi Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar,” Symmetry Pas. J. Res. Math. Learn. Educ., vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2022.

S. P. Rukin, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Takalar: Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia, 2019.

A. Giorgi and B. Giorgi, Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London : SAGE Publications, 2003.

M. I. Daulay and H. Y. Daulay, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas II Sekolah Dasar,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 272–280, 2021.

G. Brousseau, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

L. Marinda, “Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget Dan Problematikanya Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar,” An-Nisa’ J. Kaji. Peremp. dan Keislam., vol. XIII, no. 1, pp. 116–152, 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.19792

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.