Exploration of Students' Skills in Describing Physics Problems: The Effect of STEM-Project-Based Learning

Nehru Nehru, Wawan Kurniawan, Cicyn Riantoni

Abstract


The difficulty students face in describing problems from posed physics-related questions is an indicator that is rarely studied. This research explores students' abilities in describing electrical circuit problems based on implementing STEM-Project Based Learning (STEM-PBL). This study employed a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory model. The subjects were 35 undergraduate Physics Education students at the University of Jambi enrolled in the Electromagnetism course. Data collection was carried out through tests and interviews. The test instrument used five reasoned multiple-choice questions, while the interview instrument used open-ended questions based on the problems identified from the test results. The study's findings revealed an effect size of 2.1 (medium category) and an N-Gain of 0.5 (medium category). Thus, STEM-PBL influences students' ability to describe problems. Future research should investigate the influence of other variables, such as educational background and learning motivation, on the effectiveness of STEM-PBL in developing students' problem-description skills further.

Keywords


problem-solving, project-based learning, STEM, useful description

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Ceberio, J. M. Almudí, and Á. Franco, “Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. XXV, no. 4, pp. 590–609, 2016.

B. Ibrahim and N. S. Rebello, “Role of mental representations in problem solving: Students’ approaches to nondirected tasks,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. IX, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2013.

W. K. Adams and C. E. Wieman, “Analyzing the many skills involved in solving complex physics problems,” Am. J. Phys., vol. LXXXIII, no. 5, pp. 459–467, 2015.

J. L. Docktor and J. P. Mestre, “Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. X, no. 2, pp. 1–58, 2014.

J. L. Docktor, N. E. Strand, J. P. Mestre, and B. H. Ross, “A conceptual approach to physics problem solving,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1289, pp. 137–140, 2010.

S. Sutopo, “Students’ Understanding Of Fundamental Concepts Of Mechanical Wave,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones., vol. XII, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2016.

J. L. Docktor, N. E. Strand, J. P. Mestre, and B. H. Ross, “Conceptual problem solving in high school physics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XI, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2015.

J. L. Docktor et al., “Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XII, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2016.

C. Riantoni, L. Yuliati, N. Mufti, and N. Nehru, “Problem solving approach in electrical energy and power on students as physics teacher candidates,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. VI, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2017.

M. M. Hull, E. Kuo, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. IX, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2013.

N. Balta, A. J. Mason, and C. Singh, “Surveying Turkish high school and university students’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XII, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2016.

R. S. Nixon, L. K. Smith, and J. J. Wimmer, “Teaching Multiple Modes of Representation in Middle-School Science Classrooms: Impact on Student Learning and Multimodal Use,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. CXV, no. 4, pp. 186–199, 2015.

D. E. Meltzer, “Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format,” Am. J. Phys., vol. LXXIII, no. 5, pp. 463-478, 2005.

M. R. A. Taqwa, A. Zainuddin, and C. Riantoni, “Multi representation approach to increase the students’ conceptual understanding of work and energy,” in 6th International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education, ICMSE 2019, vol. MDLXVII, no. 3, pp. 1-9, 2020.

E. F. Redish, R. E. Scherr, and J. Tuminaro, “Reverse-Engineering the Solution of a ‘Simple’ Physics Problem: Why Learning Physics Is Harder Than It Looks,” Phys. Teach., vol. XLIV, no. 5, pp. 293–300, 2006.

D. Rosengrant, A. Van Heuvelen, and E. Etkina, “Do students use and understand free-body diagrams?,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. V, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009.

L. N. Walsh, R. G. Howard, and B. Bowe, “Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in physics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2007.

N. Nehru, C. Riantoni, D. P. Rasmi, W. Kurniawan, and Iskandar, “‘Knowledge in pieces’ view: Conceptual understanding analysis of pre-service physics teachers on direct current resistive electrical circuits,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. VIII, no. 2, pp. 723–730, 2020.

J. Tuminaro and E. F. Redish, “Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2007.

P. B. Kohl, D. Rosengrant, and N. D. Finkelstein, “Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. III, no. 010108, pp. 1–10, 2007.

C. Guerra, A. Moreira, and R. M. Vieira, “A design framework for science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. DCXXI, no. 32, pp. 193–203, 2018.

Y.S. Hsu, T.L. Lai, and W.H. Hsu, “A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. XLV, no. 2, pp. 241–273, 2015.

D. Persano Adorno, N. Pizzolato, and C. Fazio, “Long term stability of learning outcomes in undergraduates after an open-inquiry instruction on thermal science,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XIV, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2018.

T. Bruckermann, E. Aschermann, A. Bresges, and K. Schlüter, “Metacognitive and multimedia support of experiments in inquiry learning for science teacher preparation,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. XXXIX, no. 6, pp. 701–722, 2017.

K. Papanikolaou, K. Makri, and P. Roussos, “Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. XIV, no. 1, 2017.

L, Kadir and G. Satriawati, “The implementation of open-inquiry approach to improve students’ learning activities, responses, and mathematical creative thinking skills,” J. Math. Educ., vol. VIII, no. 1, pp. 103–114, 2017.

M. De Cock, “Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. VIII, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2012.

H. Jang, “Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. XXV, no. 2, pp. 284–301, 2016.

N. Chidayati, I. W. Distrik, and A. Abdurrahman, “Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill with STEM-Oriented E-Module,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. IV, no. 3, pp. 274–286, 2021.

F. Karakaya and S. S. Avgın, “Effect of demographic features to middle school students’ attitude towards FeTeMM (STEM),” J. Hum. Sci., vol. XIII, no. 3, pp. 4188-4198, 2016.

B. Tekerek and F. Karakaya, “STEM Education Awareness of Pre-service Science Teachers,” Int. Online J. Educ. Teach., vol. V, no. 2, pp. 348–359, 2018.

N. A. A. Zaki, N. Z. M. Zain, N. A. Z. M. Noor, and H. Hashim, “Developing a conceptual model of learning analytics in serious games for stem education,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. IX, no. 3, pp. 330–339, 2020.

K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2019.

W. B. N. Dosinaeng, S. I. Leton, and M. Lakapu, “Kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematis berorientasi HOTS,” JNPM (Jurnal Nas. Pendidik. Mat., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 250–264, 2019.

D. D. Samo, “Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika mahasiswa tahun pertama dalam memecahkan masalah geometri konteks budaya,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2017.

Y. Sulistyorini and S. Napfiah, “Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah kalkulus,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. III, no. 2, pp. 279–287, 2019.

R. Amalia, “Kemampuan berpikir matematis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri,” EDU-MAT J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2017.

S. Khoiriyah, “Kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa dalam pemecahan masalah kalkulus II,” J. e-DuMath, vol. II, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 2016.

J. W. Cresswell, and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mix Methods Research. United State America: SAGE Publication, 2017.

L. Yuliati, C. Riantoni, and N. Mufti, “Problem solving skills on direct current electricity through inquiry-based learning with PhET simulations,” Int. J. Instr., vol. XI, no. 4, pp. 123–138, 2018.

R. D. Anazifa and D. Djukri, “Project- based learning and problem- based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills?,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. VI, no. 2, pp. 346–355, 2017.

D. McPadden and E. Brewe, “Impact of the second semester University Modeling Instruction course on students’ representation choices,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XIII, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2017.

S. Zubaidah, “STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics): Pembelajaran untuk Memberdayakan Keterampilan Abad ke-21,” J. Educ., vol. III, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021.

T. Mulyani, “The Movement of STEM Education in Indonesia: Science Teachers’ Perspectives,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. VIII, no. 3, pp. 453–460, 2019.

Y. Doppelt, “Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. XIII, no. 3, pp. 255–272, 2003.

W. Widya, D. Maielfi, A. Alfiyandri, and W. Hamidah, “Creative Problem Solving-Based Electronic Module Integrated with 21st Century Skills,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. IV, no. 3, pp. 333–342, 2021.

C. A. Ogilvie, “Changes in students’ problem-solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted problems,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. V, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2009.

E. Yerushalmi, E. Cohen, K. Heller, P. Heller, and C. Henderson, “Instructors’ reasons for choosing problem features in a calculus-based introductory physics course,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. VI, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2010.

Q. X. Ryan, E. Frodermann, K. Heller, L. Hsu, and A. Mason, “Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics : Design and usability studies,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. XII, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2016.

C. Singh and A. Mason, “Physics graduate students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2009, vol. MCLXXIX, no. 1, pp. 273–276, 2009.

P. B. Kohl and N. D. Finkelstein, “Effects of representation on students solving physics problems: A fine-grained characterization,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. II, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.18289

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.