KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA INDONESIA DALAM BERKOMUNIKASI DOSEN DAN MAHASISWA IAIN RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG

MARDIYAH MARDIYAH

Abstract


The ethically communication activity is needed by the students of Indonesian Education and Art Department while interacting with the staffs since the area of campus is the educational area, so the students have toshow their respectful to the staffs by using well mannered languages.This research formulates the problem into two, they are (1) How is the ethical communication used by the students of FDIK  academic year 2011- 2013 with the staffs of FDIK in form of languages. (2) How is the principles fault of ethical communication used by the students of FDIK academic year 2008-2011 with the staf in form of languages.Based on the aboveformulation, the objectives of this research are (1) to describe the ethical languages used by the students of FDIK academic year 2011-2013 with the staffs in form of languages.(2) To describe the principles fault of ethical communication used by the students of FDIK academic year 2011-2013 with the staffs in form of languages.This study ses Ethical Principles by Leech. This research uses qualitative-descriptive method. Tabulation of data result shows that (1)Ethical language which often used by the students in communication with the staffs is tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, Aggrement maxim, sympathy maxim. (2) Unethicallanguage that often appear is a language that break tact maxim and approbation maxim principles

Keywords


Ethical principles; ethical language; unethical language

References


Baehaqie, Imam. 2008 “Pembelajaran Kesantunan Konstruktif. Upaya Merekonstruksi Akhlak Bangsa Melalui Pendidikan Bangsa” dalam Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Berbagai Perspektif. Tiara Wacana. Yogyakarta.

Brown, P dan Lenvinson SC. 1987. Politeness some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Perss. Cambridge.

Chaer, A dan Leonie Agustina. 2004. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Djajasudarma, T. dan Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguiatik. Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. PT Eresco. Bandung.

Guntur Tarigan, Henry. 2009. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Angkasa. Bandung.

Leech, G. 1983. Principle of Pragmatic. Longman. London.

Leech, Geoffry N. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Universitas Indonesia Press. Jakarta.

Levinson, C. 1983. Stephen. Pragmatic. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja RosdaKarya. Bandung.

Pranowo. 2008. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia sebagai Pembentuk Kepribadian Bangsa”. Makalah Kongres IX Bhasa Indonesia. Pusat Bahasa & Depdiknas. Jakarta.

_______. 2009. Berbahasa secara Santun. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Putu Wijana I, 2009. Dewa. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik Kajian Teori Dan Analisis.YumaPustaka. Surakarta.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2005. Pragmatik. Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Erlanga. Jakarta.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode Linguistik Bagian Kedua. Metode dan Aneka Peks pengumpulan Data. Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif R&D. alfabeta. Bandung.

Suryadi, M. Surono dan Kemala Devi. 2008. “Kesantunan Tindak tutur Penyangkalan Penutur Jawa untuk Menjaga Prinsip Kerukunan.” Dalam Nusa Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 3 No 2 (Juli 2008)

Zamzani. 1997. Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia. Dikti. Depdikbud. Jakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v3i1.1329

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Terampil : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar



________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Creative Commons License
Terampil is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported Licensep-ISSN 2355-1925e-ISSN 2580-8915

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

       

 Indonesia One Search