Guided Discovery-Blended Learning (GDBL): An Innovative Learning to Improve Conceptual Excretory System

Suparini Suparini, Rusdi Rusdi, Rizhal Hendi Ristanto

Abstract


This research aimed to determine the effect of the Guided Discovery Blended Learning (GDBL) strategy on concept mastery of the human excretory system. The research method was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest control group design. The samples consisted of the eleventh-grade students of Senior High school Jakarta in 2019/2020. Class MIPA-2 was the control class taught using Guided Discovery, and class MIPA-4 were the experimental class taught using GDBL. The learning process had been carried out both online and in the classroom. Research data were collected by integrating essay tests, students' responses to learning strategies, and observation sheets of syntax implementation. The data were descriptively analyzed and tested using ANCOVA. The normality test was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov formula, and the homogeneity test was performed using Levene's test. The statistical tests indicated that the data were normally distributed and homogeneous; thus, ANCOVA analysis using SPSS 24 was performed. The data analysis with the ANCOVA test at 0,05 significance level obtained p value = 0.000, which means that H0 was rejected. The research result implied that GDBL affected students' concept mastery of the human excretory system. It cultivated habits to independently rearrange the concept through teachers' guidance, both from sourcebooks and online media. GDBL can be used as an alternative for biology studies.

Keywords


Blended learning; Excretory; Guided discovery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamson, D., & Kapur, M. (2018). Reinventing discovery learning: A field-wide research program. Instructional Science, 46, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9444-y

Aini, Z., Ramdani, A., & Raksun, A. (2018). Perbedaan penguasaan konsep biologi dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X pada penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation dan guided inquiry di MAN 1 Praya. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i1.466

Anders, P. L., Stellrecht, E. M., Davis, E. L., & McCall Jr., W. D. (2019). A systematic review of critical thinking instruments for use in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 83(4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.043

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2002). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 41, Issue 4).

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for assessing a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.

Ark, T. Vander, Hudson, T., & Baugh, J. (2014). Blended learning: Best practices for empowering students and educator. District Administration Web Seminar. http://www.districadministration.com/ws032014

Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A blended learning model for learning achievement enhancement of Thai undergraduate students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48–55. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.532

Best, B., & Conceição, S. C. O. (2017). Transactional distance dialogic interactions and student satisfaction in a multi-institutional blended learning environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0009

Diep, A. N., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., & Blieck, Y. (2017). Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12431

Ducret, J.-J. (2001). Constructivism: Uses and prospects in education. Prospects, 31(2), 149–160.

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan model pembelajaran. Mengajarkan konten dan keterampilan berpikir (Terjemahan Satrio Wahono). Boston: Pearson.

Gurubatham, M. R. (2013). Blended action learning involving metacognition and active discussion internationally. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2157–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.182

Harahap, L. J., Ristanto, R. H., & Komala, R. (2020). Evoking 21st-century skills: Developing instrument of critical thinking skills and mastery of ecosystem concepts. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.5943

Heinze, A., Procter, C., & Scott, B. (2007). Use of conversation theory to underpin blended learning. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1(1/2), 108. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2007.014213

Ismanto, E., Novalia, M., & Herlandy, P. B. (2017). Pemanfaatan smartphone android sebagai media pembelajaran bagi guru SMA Negeri 2 kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pengabdian Untuk Mu Negeri, 1(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.37859/jpumri.v1i1.33

Johnson, A. P. (2017). Bruner’s learning theory. In Rowman and Littlefield.

Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Khairaty, N. I., Taiyeb, A. M., & Hartati, H. (2018). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem peredaran darah dengan menggunakan three-tier test di kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Bontonompo. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 6(1), 7.

Kristiani, E., Ristanto, R. H., & Lisanti, E. (2020). Exploring gender-based biological concepts: An analysis of bilingual secondary school students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n1.1-13

Martaida, T., Bukit, N., & Ginting, E. M. (2017). The effect of discovery learning model on student’s critical thinking and cognitive ability in junior high school. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0706010108

McGrath, V. (2013). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs memorial. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.21225/d51g6h

Montoro, M. A., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., & Sánchez, F. R. (2015). A study on ICT training among faculty members of spanish faculties of education. New Educational Review, 42(4), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.42.4.02

Musyaddad, A., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Evoking the four dimensions of student knowledge in ecosystem: Effectiveness of real object, web, and blended learning. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.194-210

Nair, T. S., & Bindu, R. L. (2016). Effect of blended learning strategy on achievement in biology and social and environmental attitude of students at secondary level. Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.4.6011

Ningsih, L. R., Rusdi, R., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Exploring respiratory system to improve biological learning motivation: Resysmart media application. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.211-222

Norberg, A., Dziuban, C. D., & & Moskal, P. . (2011). A time‐based blended learning model. On the Horizon, 19(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163913

Permana, F. H., & Chamisijatin, L. (2019). Project-based learning through edmodo: Improving critical thinking and histology concepts. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n1.58-69

Phanphech, P., Tanitteerapan, T., & Murphy, E. (2019). Explaining and enacting for conceptual understanding in secondary school physics. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 180–204.

Plessis, A. Du. (2015). Rethinking traditional science teaching through infusing ICT learning embedded by a ‘learning-as-design’ approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 4–6.

Raida, S. A. (2018). Identifikasi materi biologi SMA sulit menurut pandangan siswa dan guru SMA se-kota Salatiga. Journal of Biology Education, 1(2), 209–222.

Rindah, M. A. K., Dwiastuti, S., & Rinanto, Y. (2019). Excretory system learning in senior high school: Comparative analysis of students’ problem solving skills. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.249-257

Ristanto, R. H., Zubaidah, S., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2018). From a reader to a scientist: developing cirgi learning to empower scientific literacy and mastery of biology concept. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.90-100

Rusdi, R., Evriyani, D., & Praharsih, D. K. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran peer instruction flip dan flipped classroom terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada materi sistem ekskresi. Biologi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.9-1.3

Rusman. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2016). Understanding misconceptions teaching and learning in middle school physical science. American Educator: Spring, 40(1), 26–32.

Sartono, N., Rusdi, R., & Handayani, R. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) dan discovery learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir analisis siswa SMAN 27 Jakarta pada materi sistem imun. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-1.8

Shieh, C. J., & Yu, L. (2016). A study on information technology integrated guided discovery instruction towards students’ learning achievement and learning retention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1554a

Smet, D.Cindy., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2012). Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 688–696.

Sugiharto, B., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Ibrohim, I. (2019). The pre-service biology teacher readiness in Blended Collaborative Problem Based Learning (BCPBL). International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1248a

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tudor, S. L. (2013). The role of multimedia strategies in educational process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.375

Widyastuti, W. (2017). Meningkatkan aktivitas dan penguasaan konsep biologi menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation pada siswa kelas X SMA 3 Bantul. Jurnal Ilmiah Guru COPE, 21(2), 103–110.

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis. In Harper & Row.

Zulfia, F. A., Susilo, H., & Listyorini, D. (2019). Virus-bacteria diagnostic test (Vbd-Test) in identifying biology teacher’s misconception. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i2.6849

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. p-ISSN 2301-7562 | e-ISSN 2579-7964