Developing and Validating Critical-Heutagogy Learning (CHL) to Enhance Lifelong Learning: A Rasch Analysis Approach

Idham Kholid; Supriyadi Supriyadi

doi:10.24042/tadris.v8i2.14564

Developing and Validating Critical-Heutagogy Learning (CHL) to Enhance Lifelong Learning: A Rasch Analysis Approach

Idham Kholid, Supriyadi Supriyadi

Abstract

This research is dedicated to the development and validation of Critical-Heutagogy Learning (CHL), an innovative pedagogical approach designed to foster lifelong learning among university students. In an era characterized by rapid changes, the imperative for lifelong learning is paramount, necessitating individuals to continually update their knowledge and skills to remain adaptable and successful in diverse environments. To evaluate the validity and reliability of CHL, this study employs Rasch analysis. The development phase of CHL encompassed an exhaustive review of relevant literature, consultations with subject matter experts, and an iterative design methodology. This process was critical to ensure that CHL adhered to established principles of lifelong learning while promoting critical thinking and heutagogical practices. For the validation phase, CHL tools were administered to a heterogeneous group of students across multiple educational contexts. The gathered data underwent rigorous Rasch analysis to ascertain the framework's reliability, evaluate item fit, and pinpoint areas necessitating enhancements. The findings indicate that CHL is both a valid and reliable approach, with a high percentage (89.5%) of student respondents affirming its effectiveness in fostering engagement in learning and enhancing autonomous learning competencies. Additionally, this study delves into the interactions between bias and differential item functioning. The outcomes of this research offer a valuable contribution to the field of education, presenting a rigorously validated framework that supports lifelong learning. This is achieved through the promotion of critical thinking and the facilitation of independent learning skills, thus aligning with contemporary educational objectives and needs.

Keywords

Critical Heutagogy Learning; Critical thinking; Lifelong learning; Rasch analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: A review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329

Andrich, D. (2017). Advances in social measurement: A Rasch measurement theory. In F. Guillemin, A. Leplege, S. Briancon, E. Spitz, & J. Coste (Eds.), Perceived Health and Adaptation in Chronic Disease (1st ed., pp. 66–91). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155074-7

Ashton, J., & Newman, L. (2006). An unfinished symphony: 21 st century teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00662.x

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076

Blaschke, L. M. (2021). The dynamic mix of heutagogy and technology: Preparing learners for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1629–1645. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13105

Bond, T. G., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (Fourth edition). Routledge.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Briška, I., & Siliņa-Jasjukeviča, G. (2022). Promoting Pre-service Teachers’ Domain-general Metacognition. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 49, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2022.49.3

Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069

Datungsolang, R. (2018). Konsep Pendidikan Pembebasan dalam Perspektif Islam (Studi Pemikiran Paulo Freire). Jurnal Ilmiah AL-Jauhari: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Interdisipliner, 3(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.30603/jiaj.v3i1.686

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (Eighth edition). Pearson.

Dousay, T. A. (2017). Instructional Design Models. In In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. EdTechBooks.org. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/instructional_design_models

Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. (2021). Lifelong learning and the Internet: Who benefits most from learning online? British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13041

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Critical Thinking, 31.

Faiz, A., & Kurniawaty, I. (2020). Konsep Merdeka Belajar Pendidikan Indonesia dalam Perspektif Filsafat Progresivisme. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v12i2.973

Ferary, D. (2021). On Ki Hadjar Dewantara’s Philosophy of Education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4156

Fitra, D. K. (2022). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Perspektif Progresivisme pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa. 5(3), 9.

Gillaspy, E., & Vasilica, C. (2021). Developing the digital self-determined learner through heutagogical design. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1916981

Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy (2nd edition). Bloomsbury Academic.

Glassner, A., & Back, S. (2020). Three “Gogies”: Pedagogy, Andragogy, Heutagogy. In A. Glassner & S. Back, Exploring Heutagogy in Higher Education (pp. 59–74). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4144-5_5

Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: Some challenges and opportunities. Impact: Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-Learning, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/doi: 10.5043/impact.13

Hase, S. (Ed.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8766

Herpanda, Y., & Neviyarni S, N. S. (2022). Relevansi Pemikiran Humanisme Terhadap Konsep Merdeka Belajar dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 4(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v4i2.1032

Kamenetz, A. (2010). DIY U: Edupunks, edupreneurs, and the coming transformation of higher education. Chelsea Green Pub.

Köseoğlu, S., Veletsianos, G., & Rowell, C. (Eds.). (2023). Critical digital pedagogy in higher education. AU Press.

Lock, J., Lakhal, S., Cleveland‐Innes, M., Arancibia, P., Dell, D., & De Silva, N. (2021). Creating technology‐enabled lifelong learning: A heutagogical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1646–1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13122

Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204

M. Yunus Abu Bakar, Baharun, H., & Nur Silfiataun Hasanah. (2022). Heutagogy in Improving Metacognitive Intelligence of Students in Pesantren. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 7(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v7i2.2503

Mohd Salleh, U. K., Zulnaidi, H., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2019). Factors Affecting University Students’ Lifelong Learning in Indonesia. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 8(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem/vol8no1.5

Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing lifelong learning with heutagogy: Contexts, critiques, and challenges. Distance Education, 41(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1766949

Mujahid, A., & Aderus, A. (2022). Humanistic Education and the Concept of “Merdeka Belajar” in Indonesia: A Perspective of the Qur’an. 14, 10.

Mustaghfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” Perspektif Aliran Progresivisme John Dewey. 3(1), 7.

Nasution, A. G. J. (2020). Diskursus Merdeka Belajar Perspektif Pendidikan Humanisme. 2020, 15.

Rahadian, D. (2018). Pergeseran Paradigma Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal petik, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v2i1.60

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sesfao, M. (2020). Perbandingan Pemikiran Pendidikan Paulo Freire Dengan Ajaran Tamansiswa Dalam Implementasi Merdeka Belajar. 2020.

Shor, I., Matusov, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & Cresswell, J. (2017). Dialogic & Critical Pedagogies: An Interview with Ira Shor. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 5. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2017.208

Shpeizer, R., & Glassner, A. (2020). Free Will and Heutagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, SF80–SF86. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.347

Siswadi, G. A. (2022). Pemikiran Filosofis Paulo Freire Terhadap Persoalan Pendidikan dan Relevansinya Dengan Sistem Merdeka Belajar di Indonesia. Guna Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Hindu, 9(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.25078/gw.v9i2.164

Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402

Starkey, L. (2012). Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117422

Sugiarta, I. M., Mardana, I. B. P., Adiarta, A., & Artanayasa, W. (2019). Filsafat Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara (Tokoh Timur). Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 2(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v2i3.22187

Topatimasang, R., Fakih, M., Rahardjo, T., & Dilts, R. (2010). Pendidikan popular: Membangun kesadaran kritis (Cet. 4). Insist Press.

Veletsianos, G. (2010). Emerging technologies in distance education. AU Press.

Wind, S. A., & Hua, C. (2022). Rasch measurement theory analysis in R (First edition). CRC Press.

Wismaningrum, Y. dwi R., Prayitno, H. J., & Supriyanto, E. (2020). Heutagogy Approach: The Implementation of New Normal Era Learning: The 5th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PFEIC 2020), Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201015.029

Yi, Y., Li, G., Wang, Y., & Lu, Z. (2021). Learning to Share in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.08702

Yusuf, M., & Arfiansyah, W. (2021). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” dalam Pandangan Filsafat Konstruktivisme. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 7(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.53627/jam.v7i2.3996

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v8i2.14564

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. p-ISSN 2301-7562 | e-ISSN 2579-7964