Peningkatan Kinerja Guru dalam Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran Melalui Pelaksanaan Supervisi Akademik dan In House Training

rizki wahyu yunian, Hasanudin Hasanudin, Undang Rosidin, Hasan Hariri, Sowiyah Sowiyah

Abstract


Many teacher performance issues include: Implementation of learning that does not go according to plan; teacher performance in lesson planning is still intermediate and low; The subject of this study was his SMP teachers. The research method is school action research. Consistent with the results obtained, it can be concluded that educator performance in learning planning was significantly enhanced by optimizing academic supervision through group and individual techniques. Based on our findings:

Document completeness increased from 50%, 88% to 94%. PTS is planning a 90% increase to meet document completeness success metrics and stop the cycle. and four predicates for performance evaluation in cycle I, the predicate distribution is: 0% not good, 42% pretty good, 58 good, 0% very good. In cycle II, the predicate distribution is:Poor 0%, Fairly Good 8, Good 42 to Very Good 49. Predicate Good and Very Good 42 + 49 = 91%. Therefore, we can say that the predicate performance distribution before the cycle increased in cycle I.

 


Keywords


Teacher Performance; Learning Devices; Academic Supervision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fathih Amin. Meninjau Kembali Prinsip Dan Perencanaan Supervisi Pendidikan

Sebagai Pengawasan Dalam Pendidikan Yang Bersifat Pembinaan. V.6, No. 2. Al-Idarah : Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. 2022.

Glickman, C. . (1995). Supervision of Instruction. Boston: Allyn And Bacon Inc.

Hasibuan, M. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Akara.

Juhri. (2007). Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Muhammadiyah 2 Metro Press. Metro

Lazwardi Dedi, Implementasi Supervisi Pendidikan Di Sekolah/Madrasah.V.6, No.1, Al-Idarah : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam. 2016

Munir, A. (2008). Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Efektif. Ar-Ruzz Media: Sleman, Jogjakarta

Rosidin, U. (2017). Evaluasi dan Asesmen pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Akademik.

Sergiovanni, T. (1987). The Principalship, A Reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sola, Ermi. 2018. “Ada Apa Dengan Supervisi Pendidikan?” Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 2(1): 130–40.

Sudjana, N. (2001). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Trianto. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Konsep, Landasan Teoritis-Praktis dan Implementasinya. Prestasi Pustaka. Jakarta

Yamin, M. (2007). Profesionalisasi Guru dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Cipitat: Gaung Persada.

Zainal Aqib, E. R. (2007). Membangun Profesionalisme Guru dan Pengawas Sekolah. Bandung: CV. Krama Yuda.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v13i1.14895

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Authors

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Creative Commons License
All publications by by al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.