Dispersive thinking process to construct self-regulated learning ability in a "conceptual embodied" world
Abstract
Dispersive thinking is a process of expanding knowledge through reflective thinking, followed by creative thinking and producing various alternative solutions / answers that are unique, new, and appropriate. This research aims to describe students' dispersive thinking processes in constructing their self-regulated learning in a "Conceptual Embodied" world. Data collection methods are non-routine tests (problems) related to flat shapes, interviews, and think out loud. The results showed that students' dispersive thinking processes in constructing self-regulated learning in the "Conceptual Embodied" world consisted of the following stages: experiencing confusion (presence of experience), identifying problems, synthesizing ideas, building ideas, implementing ideas. The researcher recommends that the construction of a flat concept in the "Conceptual Embodied" world should focus on the development of the students' dispersive thinking stages.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Riset pendidikan: perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif & kuantitatif edisi kelima [ research design: planning, implementing, and evaluating qualitative & quantitative research fifth edition]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Day, R. A., & Underwood, A. L. (2012). Analisis kimia kuantitatif (Edisi 6). Erlangga.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath.
Fisher, A. (2009). Berpikir kritis: Sebuah pengantar. Erlangga.
Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking?argumentation? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001
Hannigan, S. (2018). A theoretical and practice-informed reflection on the value of failure in art. Thinking Skills and Creativity, June 2017, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.012
Hidajat, F. A., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, S., & Susiswo, S. (2019). Exploration of students’ arguments to identify perplexity from eflective process on mathematical problems. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12236a
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). Innovative tasks to improve critical and creative thinking skills. In L. V Stiff & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), Developing Mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12. 1999 Year book. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Krulik, S., Rudnick, J. A., & Milou, E. (2003). Teaching mathematics in middle school: a practical guide. Allyn and Bacon.
Lince, R. (2016). Creative thinking ability to increase student mathematical of junior high school by applying models numbered heads together. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 206–212.
Lyons, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85744-2
Muhtadi, D., & Sukirwan. (2017). Implementasi pendidikan matematika realistik (Pmr) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik dan kemandirian belajar peserta didik. Mosharafa, 6(1), 1–12.
Mulyadi, S., Basuki, A. M. H., & Rahardjo, W. (2016). Student’s tutorial system perception, academic self-efficacy, and creativity effects on self-regulated learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.059
Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (2009). Problem solving in mathematics grade 3 - 6: Powerful strategies to deepen understanding. Corwin, A SAGE Company.
Prayitno, A., Subanji, & Muksar, M. (2016). Refractive thinking with dual strategy in solving mathematics problem. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. III, 6(3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0603034956
Reichenberg, J. S., & McVee, M. B. (2019). “When your lesson is bombing”: The mediation of perplexity in the development of a reflective stance toward teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.012
Rich, J. D., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). Creating all in the family : A case study in creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2004.9651456
Ricks, T. E. (2011). Process reflection during Japanese lesson study experiences by prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9155-7
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at john dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2011). Level of student’s creative thinking in classroom mathematics. Educational Research and Review, 6(7), 548–553.
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’creative thinking process stages : Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2016). Algebraic procedures and creative thinking. ZDM, Kieran 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0803-y
Tall, D. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24.
Van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 158, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000
Wheeler, S., Waite, S. J., & Bromfield, C. (2002). Promoting creativity through the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 367–378.
Zachariades, T., Christou, C., & Pitta-pantazi, D. (2013). Reflective, systemic and analytic thinking in real numbers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9413-y
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v4i2.6949
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Desimal: Jurnal Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
