Prestasi dan Kemandirian Belajar dalam Geometri Tranformasi melalui Learning Cycle 5E Berbantuan Software

Pitriani Pitriani

Abstract


This action research was aimed at describing the students’ achievement and self-regulated learning after taking the instruction using Software-Assisted Learning Cycle 5E. Learning Cycle 5E are engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation. The subjects were the students of the Mathematics Education Department of FKIP Universitas Tamansiswa Palembang taking Geometry Transformation Subject in the 2017/2018. The steps of this two-cycle action research included: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The prior condition (pre-cycle) showed that the average of students’ achievement is 55.64 with the average student passing is 54,29%. After the application of Reciprocal Teaching, the average of students’ achievement increased to 58,56 in cycle I (60,00%) and to 81,44 (86,67%) in cycle II. Self-regulated learning shows the positive result. The students showed a positive response. The students were enthusiastic about joining the class.


Keywords


Learning Cycle 5E; students’ achievement; self regulated learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van hiele’s phase-based instruction using the geometer’s sketchpad (GSP) on students’ levels of geometric thinking. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 1652–1660.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5, 88–98.

Dogan, M., & İçel, R. (2011). The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 1441–1458.

Hanuscin, D. L., & Lee, M. H. (2008). Using the learning cycle as a model for teaching the learning cycle to preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 51.

Judith, & M. H. (2013). Introduction to GeoGebra Version 4.4.

Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The learning cycle as a tool for planning science instruction.

Madu, B. C., & Amaechi, C. C. (2012). Effect of Five-Step Learning Cycle Model on Students’ Understanding of Concepts Related to Elasticity. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(9), 173–181.

Meng, C. C., & Idris, N. (2012). Enhancing students’ geometric thinking and achievement in solid geometry. Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 15–33.

Meng, C. C., & Sam, L. C. (2013). Enhancing primary pupils’ geometric thinking through phase-based instruction using the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 33–51.

Mynard, J., & Sorflaten, R. (2003). Independent learning in your classroom. Retrieved April, 4, 2004.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vols. 1–1). National Council of Teachers of.

Pitriani, P. (2017a). Pengembangan LKS berbasis PBL berbantuan Cabri 3D Materi Dimensi Tiga Kelas X SMA. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 3(1), 1–10.

Pitriani, P. (2017b). Problem Based Learning berbantuan Cabri 3D untuk Meningkatkan Habit OF Thinking Flexibly Siswa SMA. Nabla Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 13–25.

Ratna, W. D. (2011). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: Erlangga.

Shadaan, P., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using GeoGebra on Students’ Understanding in Learning Circles. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1–11.

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Russell, J. D., & Mims, C. (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning.

Sukarno, A. (1999). Ciri-ciri Kemandirian Belajar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2007). Metode penelitian. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sumarmo, U. (2004). Kemandirian belajar: apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. In Makalah pada Seminar Tingkat Nasional. FPMIPA UNY Yogyakarta Tanggal (Vol. 8).

Tampubolon, S. (2014). Penelitian tindakan kelas sebagai pengembangan profesi pendidik dan keilmuan. Jakarta: Erlangga.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i2.2483

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Desimal: Jurnal Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  Creative Commons License
Desimal: Jurnal Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.