Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd

Raha Bistara

Abstract


This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of  various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of  rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. 


Keywords


Ibn Rusyd; agama; filsafat; akal; metode demonstratif

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Khudori Sholeh. Filsafat Islam Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Bandung: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.

Abdul Qadir Jaelani. Filsafat Islam. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1993.

Abu Al-Walid Ibn Rusyd. Fasl Al-Maqal Fi Mabaina Al-Hikmah Wa Al-Syari’ah Min Al-Ittishal. Kairo: Dar el-Ma’arif, 1972.

———. Tahafut At-Tahafut. Kairo: Dar el-Ma’arif, 1986.

Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. Tahafut Al-Falasifah. Kairo: Dar Ma’arif, 1957.

Ahmad Fuad al-Ahwani. Filsafat Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1995.

Akilah Mahmud. “JEJAK PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBNU RUSYD DALAM PERKEMBANGAN TEOLOGI ISLAM.” Sulesana 13, no. 2 (2019): 183–98.

Ali Mahdi Khan. The Elements of Islamic Philosophy. Pakistan: Sh Asraf, 1999.

Ali Syari’ati. Humanisme Antara Islam Dan Madzhab Barat. Edited by Afif Muhammad. Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah, 1992.

Amroeni Drajat. Filsafat Islam Buat Yang Pengen Tahu. Surabaya: Penerbit Erlangga, 2011.

Dominique Urvoy. Ibn Rushd (Avveroes). Surabaya: Risalah Gusti, 2000.

Faturohman. “Ibnu Rusyd Dan Pemikirannya.” Tsarwah (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam) 1, no. 1 (2016): 109–22. http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/tsarwah/article/download/133/135/.

Hamka, Zainuddin. “Ibnu Rusyd: (Pembelaan Terhadap Para Filosof).” Ash-Shahabah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 49–54.

Ibrahim Madkour. Fi Al-Falsafah Al-Islamiyah: Manhaj Wa Tatbiqub Al-Juz’ Al-Sani. Edited by Yudian Wahyudi Asmin. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Ismail Asy-Syarafa. Ensiklopedi Filsafat. Jakarta: Khalifa, 2005.

Leaman, Oliver. A Breaf Intrudaction of Islamic Phylosphy, 2001.

M. Iqbal Hassan. Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian Dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesai, 2002.

M. M Syarif. Para Filosof Muslim. Bandung: Mizan, 1991.

Majid Fakhry. A.History Of Islamic Philosophy. Edited by Mulyadi Kartanegara. Jakarta: Dunia Pustaka Jaya, 1997.

Mansur, Afrizal, Kurnial Ilahi Kurnial Ilahi, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, and M Syafwan HB. “Metode Kalam Ibn Rusyd (Kritik Atas Metode Mutakallimin).” Jurnal Ushuluddin 26, no. 1 (2018): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v26i1.4542.

Muhammad Atif Al-Iraqi. Al-Minhaj Al-Naqdi Fi Falsafah Ibn Rusyd. Edited by Aksin Wijaya. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2020.

Muhammad Mahfud Ridwan. “KAFIRNYA FILSUF MUSLIM: Ibn Rusyd Meluruskan Al-Ghazali.” Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 4, no. 01 (2016): 165–78.

Rosi Delta Fitrianah. “Ibn Rusyd (Avverois) Dan Pengaruhnya Di Barat.” Jurnal El-Afkar 5, no. 1 (2018): 23.

Rosyid, Maskur. “Membincang Kembali Hubungan Syariah Dan Filsafat.” Journal ISTIGHNA 2, no. 1 (2019): 114–41. https://doi.org/10.33853/istighna.v2i1.13.

Saleh, Sujiat Zubaidi. “Kritik Ibn Rusyd Terhadap Pandangan Para Filsuf Tentang Ketuhanan.” Tsaqafah 5, no. 1 (2009): 97. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v5i1.149.

Sayyed Hossein Nasr. Three Muslim Sages: Avicenna, Suhrawardi, Ibn’Arabi. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

Soleh, A Khudori. “IMPLIKASI PEMIKIRAN EPISTEMOLOGI IBN RUSYD.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 53, no. 9 (2015): 1–23. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/245180/245180.pdf%0Ahttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/245180%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.003%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.08.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.12.

T J De Boer. History of Philosophy in Islam. London: London Luzach, 1903.

Wijaya, Nur Rahmad Yahya. “REKONSILIASI AKAL-WAHYU DALAM FILSAFAT IBN RUSYD.” Kariman 05, no. 01 (2017): 35–64.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajsla.v16i2.9879

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.