Kekerasan Simbolik dalam Wacana Keagamaan di Indonesia

Andi Alfian

Abstract


By borrowing Pierre Bourdieu’s theory, this study argues that religious discourse is one of the instruments often used by the dominant class (the majority, who are in power) to carry out symbolic violence against the dominated class (the minority, who are ruled). For example, through religious discourses that seem plural and open, the power and domination of the dominant class are continuously perpetuated. This study aims to analyze the symbolic violence that occurs in religious discourse in Indonesia, especially in the study of religion, by reviewing the discourse of “Agama vs. Kepercayaan” and “Moderasi Beragama.” According to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory, the symbolic violence referred to here is violence that does not appear as violence and is latent. Victims of this type of violence do not feel they are victims of violence as if what happened was natural and should have been. This study also argues that symbolic violence in religious discourse in Indonesia is widely produced in educational institutions, primarily through the hands of academics, because through educational institutions, discourses of “Agama vs. Kepercayaan” and “Moderasi Beragama” are formulated and then implemented in government policies, as if the discourse has accommodated all religions and beliefs, but only perpetuates the interests of the dominant class. In short, this study argues that religious discourses such as “Agama vs. Kepercayaan” and “Moderasi Beragama” are (re)produced for the interests claimed to be for the majority through educational institutions and so on and produce symbolic violence.

Keywords


Kekerasan Simbolik; Wacana Keagamaan; Moderasi Beragama; Agama vs. Kepercayaan; Pierre Bourdieu;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfian, Andi. “Symbolic Violence in Religious Discourse in Indonesia.” In International Conference on Social and Islamic Studies, 205–214. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social and Islamic Studies 2021, 2021. https://proceedings.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/sis/SIS2021/paper/view/53.

Babbie, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. 14th ed. Vol. 22. Cengage Learning, 2014.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin, and Husni Mubarok. “Kebebasan, Kerukunan, Dan/Atau Moderasi Beragama?” Tirto.Id. Last modified 2021. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://tirto.id/kebebasan-kerukunan-dan-atau-moderasi-beragama-glcu.

Bhattacherjee, Anol. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Tampa, Florida, USA: Textbooks Collection, 2012.

Blaikie, Norman. Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. UK & USA: Polity Press and Backwell Publishing, 2005.

Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. The Craft of Research. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2008.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.

———. Outline of A Theory of Practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

———. “The Forms of Capital.” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Sociology of Education, edited by Stephen J. Ball. London: The Routledge Falmer, 2004.

Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods. Fourth. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Cipta, Hendra. “Kronologi Massa Rusak Dan Bakar Bangunan Milik Jemaah Ahmadiyah Di Sintang, 72 Jiwa Dievakuasi Dan Dugaan Pemicunya.” Kompas.Com. Last modified September 3, 2021. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/09/03/154505478/kronologi-massa-rusak-dan-bakar-bangunan-milik-jemaah-ahmadiyah-di-sintang?page=all#page2.

Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2014.

Deal, William E., and Timothy K. Beal. Theory for Religious Studies. New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, 2004. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203340073/theory-religious-studies-william-deal-timothy-beal.

Galtung, Johan. “Cultural Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 27, no. 3 (1990): 291–305.

Haryatmoko. Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia: PT. Kanisius, 2016.

———. “Menyingkap Kepalsuan Budaya Penguasa.” Basis 11–12 (2003).

Jumati, Lailatul. “Konstruksi Sosial Hari Valentine Bagi Pemuda Muslim: Studi Etnografi Virtual Pengguna Tagar #tolakvalentineday Di Instagram.” UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2020. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/47168/.

Kementerian Agama. Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI, 2019. https://kemenag.go.id/archive/naskah-pdf-buku-moderasi-beragama.

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, New Jersey: Priceton University Press, 1994.

Maarif, Samsul. “Meninjau Ulang Definisi Agama, Agama Dunia, Dan Agama Leluhur.” In Kebebasan, Toleransi, Dan Terorisme: Riset Dan Kebijakan Agama Di Indonesia, edited by Hsan Ali-Fauzi, Zainal Abidin Bagir, and Irsyad Rafsadi. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi, 2017. http://www.paramadina-pusad.or.id/download/19251/.

———. Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur Dalam Politik Agama Di Indonesia. CRCS UGM, 2017.

Martono, Nanang. Kekerasan Simbolik Di Sekolah: Sebuah Ide Sosiologi Pendidikan Pierre Bourdieu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Ds8aEAAAQBAJ.

Nazir, Muhammad. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.

Neuman, W Lawrence. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th Revise. United States of America: Pearson Education Limited, 2014.

Nurhayati, Siti Fatimah, and Iga Rusiyawati. “Valentine’s Day Bagi Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta : Dari Sudut Pandang Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Religi.” In Proceeding 6th University Research Colloquium 2017: Seri Humaniora, Sosial, Dan Agama. Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, 2017. https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/urecol/issue/view/123.

Santoso, Thomas. Teori-Teori Kekerasan. Surabaya: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002.

Sigit, Kidung Asmara, and Ismail Hasani. Intoleransi Semasa Pandemi: Kondisi Kebebasan Beragama/Berkeyakinan Di Indonesia Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2021. https://setara-institute.org/laporan-kondisi-kebebasan-beragamaberkeyakinan-di-indonesia-tahun-2020/.

Sirajuddin, M. Literasi Moderasi Beragama Di Indonesia. Bengkulu: CV. Zigie Utama, 2020.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2013.

Wijsen, Frans, and Kocku Von Stuckrad. Making Religion: Theory and Practice in the Discursive Study of Religion. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/al-adyan.v18i1.12628

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.