How to Develop Visual Representation Test Instruments on Optical Equipment Material for High School Students?

Utari Nurmahasih, Edi Istiyono, Deni Sadly, Warjo Warjo

Abstract


In physics learning, visual representation is an important tool for turning abstract concepts into more easily understood ones, especially topics about optical equipment. However, current teaching instruments are often less effective in providing adequate visualization. This research on the development of visual representation test instruments for senior high school or Islamic senior high school (SMA/MA) on optical device topic was carried out with the aims of 1) developing a visual representation test instrument on optical devices material, 2) determining the expert validity of the visual representation instrument on optical devices material, 3) determine the item validity and reliability of the visual representation instrument on optical devices material through limited trials, 4) determine the level of difficulty and differentiability of visual representation instruments on optical devices material. This research design was the Research and Development (R&D) procedure from Borg and Gall, which was modified up to the product trial stage. Data was collected from the expert validation and product trials and then analyzed using a quantitative description. Eight validators validated the visual representation instrument. The research subjects were 30 eleventh-grade science students. The results of the analysis concluded that the product was suitable for use by teachers in assessing student representation. Therefore, the visual representation test instrument for optical devices material is suitable for teachers. Through this instrument, it is hoped that we can see the ability of students' representation instruments in learning optics. 

Keywords


Evaluation instrument; Optical tools; Research and development (R&D); Representative visual

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriani, D., Rifaat, M., & Hamdani. (2013). Pengembangan representasi visual dalam lintasan kebahasaan pada teorema pythagoras. Jurnal UNTAN.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142.

Aoudni, Y., Kalra, A., Azhagumurugan, R., Ahmed, M. A., Wanjari, A. K., Singh, B., & Bhardwaj, A. (2023). Correction to: Metaheuristics based tuning of robust pid controllers for controlling voltage and current on photonics and optic. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 55(6), 11082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-04794-w

Areljung, S., Skoog, M., & Sundberg, B. (2022). Teaching for emergent disciplinary drawing in science? comparing teachers’ and children’s ways of representing science content in early childhood classrooms. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10036-4

Chonavel, T. (2000). A deep learning powered system to lie detection while online study. Traitement Du Signal, 39(3), 893–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18280/ts.390314

Chu, J., Lin, R., Qin, Z., Chen, R., Lou, L., & Yang, J. (2023). Exploring factors influencing pre-service teacher’s digital teaching competence and the mediating effects of data literacy: Empirical evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02016-y

Fliegauf, K., Sebald, J., Veith, J. M., Spiecker, H., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). Improving early optics instruction using a phenomenological approach: A field study. Optics, 3(4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.3390/opt3040035

Guan, X., Feng, X., & Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2023). The dilemma and countermeasures of educational data ethics in the age of intelligence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01633-x

He, X., Singh, C. K. S., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2022). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of higher-order thinking skills in blended learning. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 59(5), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.5.23

Hilma Wahyuni, I., & Reyza Arief Taqwa, M. (2022). Level of students conceptual understanding and resource theory view: Geometric optics. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.38

Inayah, S. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan representasi multipel matematis dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kuantum. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol3no1.2018pp1-16

Kang, K. (2021). Characteristics of an Infographic Presented in Physics i Textbooks according to the 2015 Revised Curriculum - In focus on “Waves and Info-communication.” New Physics: Sae Mulli, 71(11), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.71.921

Kaniawati, I., Rahmadani, S., Fratiwi, N. J., Suyana, I., Danawan, A., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2020). An analysis of students’ misconceptions about the implementation of active learning of optics and photonics approach assisted by computer simulation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(9), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i09.12217

Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Muwonge, C. M., & Ssenyonga, J. (2022). Profiles of learners based on their cognitive and metacognitive learning strategy use: occurrence and relations with gender, intrinsic motivation, and perceived autonomy support. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01322-1

Lo, N. P. kan. (2023). Digital learning and the esl online classroom in higher education: teachers’ perspectives. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00198-1

Migdał, P., Jankiewicz, K., Grabarz, P., Decaroli, C., & Cochin, P. (2022). Visualizing quantum mechanics in an interactive simulation – virtual lab by quantum flytrap. Optical Engineering, 61(08), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.61.8.081808

Nurulhasni, D., Nurbaiti, E. A., & Nabila, R. S. (2023). Developing and implementing an instrument for assessing critical thinking and visual representations in learning physics materials of optical instruments. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep Developing

Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Investigating the Factors affecting ICT Integration of in-service teachers in Henan Province, China: Structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z

Poldrack, R. A. (2021). The physics of representation. Synthese, 199(1–2), 1307–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02793-y

Prahani, B. K., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., Yantidewi, M., Rjauhariyah, M. N., Kelelufna, V. P., Siswanto, J., Misbah, M., Mahtari, S., & Suyidno, S. (2021). A profile of physics multiple representation ability of senior high school students on heat material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012020

Purwaningtias, W. S., & Putra, N. M. D. (2020). Analisis tingkat pemahaman konsep dan miskonsepsi fisika pada pokok bahasan alat-alat optik di SMA Negeri 1 Purwodadi. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 9(2), 139–148. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/article/view/41920

Putri, H. N. P. A., Wulandari, R. N., Fitriana, A., & Kusairi, S. (2020). The comparison of high school students’ understanding of kinematic materials: Case of question representations. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i2.6032

Salsabila, U. H., Ilmi, M. U., Aisyah, S., Nurfadila, N., & Saputra, R. (2021). Peran teknologi pendidikan dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di era disrupsi. Journal on Education, 3(01), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v3i01.348

Saputra, A. T., Jumadi, J., Paramitha, D. W., & Sarah, S. (2019). Problem-solving approach in multiple representations of qualitative and quantitative problems in kinematics motion. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i1.3801

Sartika, I., Rifat, M., & T, A. Y. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes untuk mengungkap sumber miskonsepsi berdasarkan representasi visual dalam segitiga. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v10i1.44087

Sebald, J., Fliegauf, K., Veith, J. M., Spiecker, H., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). The world through my eyes: Fostering students’ understanding of basic optics concepts related to vision and image formation. Physics (Switzerland), 4(4), 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4040073

Spicer, J. O., & Coleman, C. G. (2022). Creating effective infographics and visual abstracts to disseminate research and facilitate medical education on social media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 74(Suppl 3), E14–E22. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac058

Sunarti, T., & Amiruddin, M. Z. B. (2022). Analysis multi representation ability and learning outcomes of optical materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2392(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2392/1/012009

Taqwa, M. R. A., & Rahim, H. F. (2022). Students’ Conceptual understanding on vector topic in visual and mathematical representation: A comparative study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012060

Uwamahoro, J., Ndihokubwayo, K., Ralph, M., & Ndayambaje, I. (2021). Physics students’ conceptual understanding of geometric optics: revisited analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09913-4

Wei, B., Wang, C., & Tan, L. (2022). Visual representation of optical content in China’s and Singapore’s junior secondary physics textbooks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 20138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020138

Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2019). Development of computer simulations to overcome students misconceptions on light and optical instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032074

Widiyatmoko, Arif, & Shimizu, K. (2018). Literature review of factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in light and optical instruments. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13(10), 853–863. http://www.ijese.com

Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Shen, Z. (2023). Internet use, market transformation, and individual tolerance: Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01781-0

Zheng, R., Cordner, H., & Spears, J. (2022). The impact of annotation on concrete and abstract visual representations in science education: Testing the expertise reversal effect. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00194-y




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v13i1.17155

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.