RATIONAL RESTRICTIONS OR PRUNING OF RIGHTS ? DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING FORMAL TESTS AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Agung Barok Pratama, Aufi Imaduddin, Hilmi Yusron Rofi'i, Aldila Leo Saputra

Abstract


The time limit in the judicial review of legislative process was first made in Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-VII/2009, in legal considerations the judge made a new law (judge making of law) by limiting the filing of formal test applications 45 today the law was published in the state gazette. This was done for the sake of legal certainty and the impact of the formal test application submitted past the 45-day deadline would be rejected by the Constitutional Court. This research uses a normative or doctrinal juridical type that focuses on library research. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in limiting the filing of formal tests and analyzing these restrictions from the aspect of justice. This research is a doctrinal research using statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results of the study show that restrictions on the filing of formal tests are imposed in order to achieve legal certainty, so that the law requested for a formal test is more quickly known whether its status has been made legally or not, because formal testing will cause the law to be canceled from the start. Time restrictions in the Constitutional Court are not entirely contrary to the principle of justice, because in practice the Constitutional Court still provides space of justice for applicants to submit formal tests.


Keywords


limitation, judicial review, act

References


Abrory, Makhtum Yandi. “IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PENGATURAN KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA FIKTIF POSITIF DAN FIKTIF NEGATIF.” Negara Dan Keadilan 10, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.33474/hukum.v10i2.13182.

Ajie, Radita. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 02 (2016): 111–12.

Alwino, Alfensius. “Diskursus Mengenai Keadilan Sosial: Kajian Teori Keadilan Dalam Liberalisme Locke, Persamaan Marx, Dan ‘Justice as Fairness’ Rawls.” MELINTAS 32, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v32i3.2696.309-328.

Anggara, Sahya. “Teori Keadilan John Rawls Kritik Terhadap Demokrasi Liberal.” JISPO 1, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v1i1.710.

Arief, Moh. Zainol. “BENTURAN HUKUM SEBAGAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN RASA KEADILAN TERHADAP KORBAN KEJAHATAN.” Jurnal Jendela Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24929/fh.v4i2.1419.

Baihaki, Muhammad Reza, Fathudin Fathudin, and Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie. “Problematika Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy) Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1739.

Hapsoro, Fakhris Lutfianto, and Ismail Ismail. “Interpretasi Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Untuk Mewujudkan The Living Constitution.” Jambura Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644.

Heryansyah, Despan, and Harry Setya Nugraha. “Relevansi Putusan Uji Materi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Sistem Checks and Balances Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.353-379.

Isman, Isman. “LEGAL REASONING COMPARATIVE MODEL OF ASY SYATIBI AND GUSTAV RADBRUCH.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 20, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i1.6089.

Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “PEMAHAMAN TERHADAP ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MELALUI KONSTRUKSI PENALARAN POSITIVISME HUKUM.” CREPIDO 1, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.

Kadir, Abdul, La Ode Bariun, and Winner Agustinus Siregar. “TENGGANG WAKTU PENGAJUAN GUGATAN PADA PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA KENDARI PASCA BERLAKUNYA PERMA NO. 6 TAHUN 2018.” Jurnal Restorative Justice 6, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v6i1.4100.

Khasanah, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun, and Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja. “Perkembangan Interpretasi Hukum Oleh Hakim Di Indonesia Dalam Dominasi Tradisi Civil Law System.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (2022): 232. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.4799.

Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina. “The Courageous Judge of Gustav Radbruch.” Materiali per Una Storia Della Cultura Giuridica 2022, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1436/105734.

Marzuki, Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2017.

Munthe, Eunice Primsa. “Penetapan Daluwarsa Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Doktrina: Journal of Law 3, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/doktrina.v3i2.4050.

Putra, I Gusti Agung Ketut Bagus Wira Adi, Ida Ayu Putu Widiati, and Ni Made Puspasutari Uj. “Gugatan Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) Dalam Gugatan Cerai Gugat Di Pengadilan Agama Badung.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2565.305-309.

Putri, Kania Dewi Andhika, and Ridwan Arifin. “TINJAUAN TEORITIS KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN DALAM HUKUM DI INDONESIA (The Theoretical Review of Justice and Legal Certainty in Indonesia).” MIMBAR YUSTITIA 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v2i2.1344.

Sa’adah, Nabitatus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-247.

Sari, Adena Fitri Puspita, and Purwono Sungkono Raharjo. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator.” Souvereignty 1, no. 4 (2022): 681–91. https://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/view/112.

Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.

Socawibawa, Nur indra, and Arif Wibowo. “INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN HUKUM ACARA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.103.

Sungkar, Lailani, Wicaksana Dramanda, Susi Dwi Harijanti, and Adnan Yasar Zulfikar. “Urgensi Pengujian Formil Di Indonesia : Pengujian Legitimasi Dan Validitas.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1842.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, and Enny Nurbaningsih. “Ratio Legis Penetapan Pembayar Pajak (Taxpayer) Sebagai Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1731.

Young, Robert A. “A MOST POLITIC JUDGEMENT.” Constitutional Forum / Forum Constitutionnel 10, no. 1–4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.21991/c9208m.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tps.v20i1.22170

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

All publications by Jurnal TAPIS [ISSN-p 0216-4396; ISSN-e 2655-6057 ] are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License