Perception of Risk on Interest in Using Online Loans as an Alternative Education Financing
Abstract
Education played an important role in improving the quality of human resources. However, the high cost was an obstacle for many people to continue to a higher level. According to the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), the cost of education rises 10%-15% every year, with the cost of higher education reaching IDR 14.47 million in 2020/2021. The increase in tuition fees at some universities also added to the burden on students. On the other hand, advances in financial technology offered financing solutions through online loans. However, this option often comes with various risks. The purpose of this study was to analyze the perception of risk on the interest in making online loans as an alternative education financing. This research was a quantitative study with a voluntary sampling technique and used the Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEMPLS) analysis method. The results showed that all aspects of risk perception consisting of financial risk, security risk, psychological risk, and performance risk had a negative and significant effect on interest in making online loans as an alternative to education financing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustino, L., Ujianto, & Yousida, I. (2021). Pengaruh Promosi, Persepsi Kemudahan Dan Persepsi Manfaat Terhadap Minat Penggunaan E-Wallet. 17(3), 401–422.
Akbar, R. F. (2015). Analisis Persepsi Pelajar Tingkat Menengah Pada Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Kudus. Edukasia : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v10i1.791
BPS. (2022). STATISTIK PENUNJANG PENDIDIKAN.
Dalla, D. P., & Kewuel, H. K. (2023). Ketimpangan Akses Beasiswa dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keberlangsungan Studi Mahasiswa. Educare : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.56393/educare.v3i2.1702
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Fitri, S. F. N. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1617–1620.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Mathematics of Computation (Vol. 50, Issue 181). https://doi.org/10.2307/2007941
Hasan, S., Elpisah, Sabtohadi, J., Nurwahidah, Abdullah, & Fachrurazi. (2022). Manajemen Keuangan (Fachrurazi). CV. Pena Persada Redaksi.
Hasby, A., Akbar, K. M., & Permana, T. Y. (2024). Dampak Adanya Kebijakan Otonom PTN-BH Terhadap Komersialisasi Studi Kasus ITB. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(6), 287–291.
Huang, D., Liu, X., Lai, D., & Zhiyong, L. (2019). Users and non-users of P2P accommodation: Differences in perceived risks and behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-06-2017-0037
Lemeshow, S., Hosmer, D. W., Klar, J., & Lwanga, S. K. (1990). Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies. Biometrics, 47(1), 347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532527
Miasari, R. S., Indar, C., Pratiwi, Purwoto, Salsabila, U. H., Amalia, U., & Romli, S. (2022). Teknologi Pendidikan sebagai Jembatan Reformasi Pembelajaran di Indonesia Lebih Maju. Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 53–61.
Murairwa, S. (2015). VOLUNTARY SAMPLING DESIGN. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 4(2), 185–200.
OJK RI. (2023). Financial Technology - P2P Lending. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
Pratama, A. B., & Suputra, I. D. G. D. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, dan Tingkat Kepercayaan Pada Minat Menggunakan Uang Elektronik. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(2), 927–953. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i02.p04
Purba, A. W. A., Situmeang, N. T. F. N., Fitriani, D., Febry, K., Sihombing, F., & Siregar, Y. R. (2023). Problematika Pembiayaan Pendidikan di Sekolah. Edukasi Nonformal, 4(1), 323–334.
Sari HR, G. I., Fermayani, R., & Harahap, R. R. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Keamanan, Kualitas Pelayanan, Kualitas Produk, Dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Situs Jejaring Sosial (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Di Kota Padang). Jurnal Menara Ekonomi : Penelitian Dan Kajian Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31869/me.v6i2.1816
Sibyan, H. (2020). Implementasi Metode SMART pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Sekolah. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, 7(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.32699/ppkm.v7i1.1055
Sinaga, H. D. E., Irawati, N., & Kurniawan, E. (2019). Financial Technology: Pinjaman Online, Ya atau Tidak. TUNAS | Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 15–19.
Supriyanto, E., & Ismawati, N. (2019). Sistem Informasi Fintech Pinjaman Online Berbasis Web. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer, 9(2), 100–107.
Wijayanti, S., & Hartiningrum. (2022). Dampak Aplikasi Pinjaman online terhadap Kebutuhan dan Gaya Hidup Konsumtif Buruh Pabrik. Mizania: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 2(2), 230–235.
Wu, K., Vassileva, J., Noorian, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2015). How do you feel when you see a list of prices? The interplay among price dispersion, perceived risk and initial trust in Chinese C2C market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 25(March 2024), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.007
Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, H., & Yu, B. (2015). Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0243
Yudianto, A. (2023). Persepsi dan Pengetahuan Mahasiswa tentang Pinjaman Online (MAHASISWA STIA AMUNTAI). SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(12), 5142–5155. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i12.1899
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/revenue.v5i2.24426
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Manajemen Bisnis Syariah UIN Raden Intan Lampung