Flipped Classroom Model: Empowering Digital Literacy for Mathematics Learning in Society 5.0

Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto, Anton Jaelani, Joko Purwanto

Abstract


In the era of society 5.0, technology and education are likely two side of coin. Teachers can use technology in the classroom. Also, teachers play a role in maximizing the quality of learning. This study employed descriptive qualitative research. This study aimed produced an overview of flipped classroom used in learning activities, particularly in learning mathematics. The research data in this study were observations, semi-structure interviews, and documentation of flipped classroom learning activities. The research subjects were 37 seventh-grade students of one of junior high school in Purwokerto, Indonesia. The data analysis technique in this study consisted of four stages:1) data collection, 2) data reduction, 3) data presentation and 4) drawing conclusions. The results of this study are: 1) flipped classroom improves teachers and students digital literacy; 2) flipped classroom as one alternative learning model; 3) flipped classroom expressed students’ positive activities with technology; and 4) flipped classroom provide opportunities for parents interact with students in home activities.

Keywords


digital literacy, flipped classroom model, mathematics learning, society 5.0

Full Text:

PDF

References


C. A. Archiyesa, “Education Strategy towards Digital Competences in Welcoming Society 5.0,” J. Basic Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 33–45, 2019.

E. Aprilisa, “Realizing Society 5.0 to Face the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Teacher Education Curriculum Readiness in Indonesia,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. April, pp. 543–548, 2020, doi: 10.14421/icse.v3.559.

R. Novita and T. Herman, “Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1776, no. 1, pp. 554–563, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027.

C. Narvaez Rojas, G. A. Alomia Peñafiel, D. F. Loaiza Buitrago, and C. A. Tavera Romero, “Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society,” J. Emerg. Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 65–72, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126567.

Nurhastuti, “Pendidikan Matematika Pada Era Society 5.0,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 22, pp. 11–26, 2019.

R. Perdana, R. Yani, J. Jumadi, and D. Rosana, “Assessing Students’ Digital Literacy Skill in Senior High School Yogyakarta,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 169, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17168.

Pagina Thomson, “Higher order thinking skills in mathematics learning,” J. Adv. Res. Des., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1, 2019, doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860.

C. J. Maker, S. Jo, and O. M. Muammar, “Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the ICT Literacy, a non-traditional teacher beliefs,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 402–417, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.003.

A. Supendi and Nurjanah, “Society 5.0:Is It High-Order Thinking?,” Glob. Perspect. 21st Elem. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1054–1059, 2019.

T. Abel, J. Brazas, D. C. Jr, and A. Kemp, “Characterizing Mathematical Digital Literacy: A Preiminary Investigation,” J. Curric. Instr., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 421–430, 2018.

S. P. van Borkulo, M. Kallia, P. Drijvers, E. Barendsen, and J. Tolboom, “Computational thinking and mathematical thinking: Digital literacy in mathematics curricula,” Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Technol. Math. Teach. – ICTMT 14, vol. 6, no. October, pp. 384–386, 2019.

A. J. Toha Tohara, F. D. Mohamed Shuhidan, Shamila Saiful Bahry, and M. N. Nordin, “Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 3345–3358, 2021.

M. Novitasari, Sutama, S. Narimo, A. Fathoni, L. Rahmawati, and C. Widyasari, “Habituation of digital literacy and critical thinking in mathematics in elementary school,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3395–3399, 2020.

A. Fatahillah, I. D. Puspitasari, and S. Hussen, “The development of Schoology web-based learning media with GeoGebra to improve the ICT literacy on quadratic functions,” JRAMathEdu (Journal Res. Adv. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 304–316, 2020, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.10692.

L. Naismith, P. Lonsdale, G. Vavoula, and M. Sharples, “Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 31–44, 2016.

S. Weippert, Achim and Kajewski, “Internet-based Information and Communication Systems - A Case Study Analysis,” J. Basic Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–116, 2017, doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00005-5.

N. Vinoth and K. Nirmala, “Deaf Students Higher Education System Using E-Learning,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 41, 2017, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i1.5131.

J. Voogt, O. Erstad, C. Dede, and P. Mishra, “Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 403–413, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12029.

C. K. Lo and K. F. Hew, “A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research,” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2.

C. H. Fung, M. Besser, and K. K. Poon, “Systematic Literature Review of Flipped Classroom in Mathematics,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/10900.

Z. Cramer, “Active Learning and Flipped Classrooms in Introductory Mathematics Centre for Teaching Excellence Table of Contents,” J. Math. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 34–46, 2020.

Pardimin, S. Rochmiyati, Z. Wijayanto, and D. Supriadi, “A Needs Analysis of Flipped Classroom -Based Mathematics Learning Model,” PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 69–94, 2020.

R. Weinhandl, Z. Lavicza, M. Hohenwarter, and S. Schallert, “Enhancing flipped mathematics education by utilising GeoGeBrA,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.46328/IJEMST.V8I1.832.

R. A. Sumarni, Y. B. Bhakti, I. A. D. Astuti, D. Sulisworo, and M. Toifur, “The Development of Animation Videos Based Flipped Classroom Learning on Heat and Temperature Topics,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 304–315, 2020, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.7017.

A. M. Ruswana, “Applıcatıon Of Flıpped Classroom Learnıng Models Wıth Peer Instructıon Flıpped Type To Improve The Mathematıcal Problems Solvıng Abılıty Of Pre- Prosperous Students,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 168–183, 2019.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method. 2014.

L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education Sixth Edition. 2013.

K. Umam, T. Nusantara, I. N. Parta, E. Hidayanto, and H. Mulyono, “An application of flipped classroom in mathematics teacher education programme,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 68–80, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v13i03.10207.

L. R. Hidayah and A. Mustadi, “The Implementation of the Flipped Classroom for Early Grade Students in Elementary School,” J. Math. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2021.

X. Wei et al., “Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1461–1484, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x.

L. Jin, “The Flipped Classroom Approach in Calculus Teaching with Mathematics Software,” J. Res. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 168–170, 2019, doi: 10.2991/ssphe-18.2019.40.

E. Apriska and Sugiman, “Flipped classroom research trends in mathematics learning in Indonesia,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1613, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012030.

D. Oakes, A. Davies, M. Joubert, and S. Lyakhova, “Exploring teachers’ and students’ responses to the use of a Flipped Classroom teaching approach in mathematics,” BSRLM Proceedings, King’s Coll. London 38(3), vol. 38, no. November, pp. 1–6, 2018.

B. Lestari and S. Noer, “The Learning Strategy of The Flipped Classroom With Gamification As An Alternative Learning Solution During The Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Teach. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 54–66, 2021, doi: 10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305193.

M. Katsa, S. Sergis, and D. G. Sampson, “Investigating the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 mathematics teaching and learning,” 13th Int. Conf. Cogn. Explor. Learn. Digit. Age, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 210–218, 2016.

Ramakrishnan and JohnsiPriya, “Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Mathematics Teaching,” Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 57–62, 2018, doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i10(se).2016.2469.

R. A. Efiuvwere and E. F. Fomsi, “Flipping the Mathematics Classroom to Enhance Senior Secondary Students Interest,” Int. J. Math. Trends Technol., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 95–101, 2019, doi: 10.14445/22315373/ijmtt-v65i2p516.

Sutama, H. J. Prayitno, N. Ishartono, and D. P. Sari, “Development of Mathematics Learning Process by Using Flipped Classroom Integrated by STEAM Education in Senior High School,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 3690–3697, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080848.

A. Rafiepour, “Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method on Learning of Mathematics of Grade 7 Female Students,” J. Elem. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 129–154, 2020.

Y. Deliktaş and I. Stojkovska, “Investigating the impact of flipped learning on mathematics performance and math anxiety,” J. Emerg. Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 27–37, 2019.

M. Weingart, “Flipping the classroom in Rutgers Mathematics Courses,” J. Appl. Quant. Methods, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55–69, 2019.

A. Birdsall, “Investigating the potential of the Flipped Classroom Model,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2017.

S. O. Makinde and H. Article, “Mass Media as a Change Agent on Childhood Social Pedagogy and Achievement,” Indones. J. Early Child. Influ. Soc., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020.

S. Eka, E. Purba, K. B. Sangka, and O. K. Hussain, “The Flipped Classroom : An Overview of its Impact on Economics Learning,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2021.

J. Heeyoung and K. Ed, “Examining the Flipped Classroom Model through Literacy and Math Integration,” J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55–68, 2019.

C. Leo, “Flipped Classroom Pedagogical Model and Middle-Level Mathematics Achievment : An Action Research Study,” J. Int. Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 553–563, 2017.

G. Charles, “Flipped Classroom Model : Effects on Performance, Attitudes and Perceptions in High School Algebra,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 33–47, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4.

S. Marsh and N. Gurski, “Flipped teaching as a method for boosting engagement and performance,” J. Emerg. Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud., vol. 4, no. July, pp. 556–568, 2016.

F. D. Fernández-Martín, J. M. Romero-Rodríguez, G. Gómez-García, and M. R. Navas-Parejo, “Impact of the flipped classroom method in the mathematical area: A systematic review,” Math. Educ. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/math8122162.

A. Sofian, E. Hidayat, W. Fitri, and A. Wihdati, “Dealing with Challenges in Teaching & Learning Mathematics in Flipped Classroom Model in Pandemic Era,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 550, no. Icmmed 2020, pp. 47–54, 2021.

P. W. Thompson, “Technology in Mathematics Education Research : The First 25 Years in the JRME,” Res. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. December 1994, pp. 22–39, 2014, doi: 10.2307/749579.

M. Ariffuddin et al., “The Implementation of Flipped Classroom Instructional to Enhance Academic Achievement among form Four Chemistry Students,” Int. J. Acad. Res., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 967–980, 2019, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i7/6195.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9638

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License