STEM : Pengaruhnya terhadap Literasi Matematis dan Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pengaruh metode STEM terhadap literasi matematis dan multiple intteligences. Metode penelitian menggunakan desain faktorial 2x3. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes essay kemampuan literasi matematika dan angket multiple intelligences. Analisis data dengan uji normalitas, homogenitas dan uji hipotesis menggunakan ANOVA dua jalur dengan SPSS Software 17.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat pengaruh kemampuan literasi matematis mahasiswa dengan menggunakan metode STEM dan non-STEM dengan metode STEM lebih baik daripada non-STEM.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. H. Fathani, “Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Sekolah dalam Perspektif Multiple Intelligences,” Edu Sains J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 4, no. 2, 2016.
R. Novita, “Exploring Primary Student’s Problem-Solving Ability by Doing Tasks Like PISA’s Question.,” Indones. Math. Soc. J. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133–150, 2012.
B. Ojose, “Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2011.
R. Hidayat, Y. Roza, and A. Murni, “Peran Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar,” JURING (Journal Res. Math. Learn., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 213–218, 2019.
I. Kuswidi, “Brain-Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis Siswa,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 2015.
N. Linuhung, “Penerapan Strategi Pemecahan Masalah Wankat-Oreovocz dalam Peningkatan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Pengetahuan Awal Matematis (PAM) Siswa,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, 2015.
N. D. Rahmawati, M. Mardiyana, and B. Usodo, “Profil Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah yang Berkaitan dengan Literasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ),” J. Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 3, no. 5, 2015.
J. L. Wilkins, “Special Issue Article: Preparing for the 21st Century: The Status of Quantitative Literacy in the United States: This article continues our October 2000 Special Issue theme of ‘A Vision for Science and Mathematics Education in the 21st Century.,’” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 405–418, 2000.
B. Baiduri, “Strategi Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Era Industri 4.0,” MUST J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–94, 2019.
M. Mujib and M. Mardiyah, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2017.
K. Stacey, “The international assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items,” in Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 2015, pp. 771–790.
M. Nuroniah, Rochmad, and K. Wijayanti, “Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Dengan Taksonomi Solo,” Unnes J. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2013.
M. Miyazaki, “What are Essential to Apply the ‘Discovery’ Function of Proof in Lower Secondary School Mathematics?,” in Proceedings of 24th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2000, pp. 1–8.
I. Rohimah and I. Nursuprianah, “Pengaruh Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Terhadap Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Bidang Datar,” EduMa, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–34, 2016.
I. Kariyana and R. A. Sonn, “Teaching Methods and Learners’ Concept Formation, Development and Integration in Geometry: Assessing the Relationship,” Int. J. Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2016.
T. Horzum and E. Ertekin, “Prospective mathematics teachers’ understanding of the base concept,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 49, no. 2, 2017.
V. Jehlička and O. Rejsek, “A Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Mathematics and Information and Communication Technology,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1705–1718, 2018.
M. Syukri, L. Halim, and T. S. M. Meerah, “Pendidikan STEM dalam Entrepreneurial Science Thinking ‘ ESciT ’: Satu Perkongsian Pengalaman dari UKM untuk ACEH,” no. March, 2013.
T. Tati, H. Firman, and R. Riandi, “The Effect of STEM Learning through the Project of Designing Boat Model toward Student STEM Literacy,” in International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), 2017, pp. 1–8.
F. Preckel, T. Goetz, R. Pekrun, and M. Kleine, “Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics,” Gift. Child Q., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 146–159, 2008.
D. T. Choridah, “Peran pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan berpikir kreatif serta disposisi matematis siswa SMA,” Infin. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 194–202, 2013.
K. Komarudin, “Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika pada materi peluang berdasarkan high order thinking dan pemberian scaffolding,” J. Darussalam J. Pendidikan, Komun. dan Pemikir. Huk. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 202–217, 2017.
S. Rijal and S. Bachtiar, “Hubungan antara Sikap, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa,” J. Bioedukatika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 15–20, 2015.
Y. Ramalisa, “Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Tipe Kepribadian Thinking dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika,” Edumatica J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 01, 2013.
S. Andriani, H. Suyitno, and I. Junaidi, “The Application of Differential Equation of Verhulst Population Model on Estimation of Bandar Lampung Population,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1155, p. 012017.
D. Triwinarni and M. Fauzi, “Pengaruh Kecerdasan Logika Matematika Terhadap Kedisiplinan Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 1 Pagar Air Kabupaten Aceh Besar,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 2, pp. 16–29, 2017.
Y. Wang, H. Peng, R. Huang, Y. Hou, and J. Wang, “Characteristics of distance learners: Research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self‐efficacy, attribution and learning results,” Open Learn. J. Open, Distance e-Learning, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2008.
P. D. Klein, “Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternatives to’learning styles’ and’multiple intelligences’,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–81, 2003.
J. Salim and M. Wibowo, “Penerapan Teori Multiple Intelligences pada Desain Interior Study Lounge di Surabaya,” Intra, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 740–749, 2019.
J. Afriana, A. Permanasari, and A. Fitriani, “Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 202, 2016.
H. Subekt, M. Taufiq, H. Susilo, I. Ibrohim, and H. Suwono, “Mengembangkan Literasi Informasi Melalui Belajar Berbasis Kehidupan Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Menyiapkan Calon Guru Sains Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Revieu Literatur,” Educ. Hum. Dev. J., vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.
A. Ismayani, “Pengaruh penerapan STEM project-based learning terhadap kreativitas matematis siswa SMK,” Indones. Digit. J. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 264–272, 2016.
Gardner, H., Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Book Inc., 1983.
A. P. Yanti and M. Syazali, “Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah-langkah Bransford dan Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2016.
M. Ahmad, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual,” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 103–103, 2019.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i1.5448
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.