The effect of e-modules on physics learning in senior high school: A meta-analysis

Muhammad Aizri Fadillah , Asrizal Asrizal , Festiyed Festiyed , Usmeldi Usmeldi

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the impact of using e-modules in physics education on senior high school through a meta-analysis. The method used is quantitative meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of e-modules in the context of physics learning. Out of 995 papers screened, 15 articles were selected for further analysis. The results show that e-modules are significantly more effective than traditional learning, with an effect size of d = 18.45, Z = 5.79 (P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the effectiveness of e-modules varies based on learning dimensions, teaching models, and the physics topics being taught. Thus, e-modules significantly positively impact various aspects of student learning, including creative thinking, critical thinking, learning outcomes, science process skills, conceptual understanding, and science literacy. This study highlights the potential of e-modules to enhance physics learning. However, some data limitations exist in certain dimensions, such as creative thinking, science process skills, conceptual understanding, and science literacy. 

Keywords


e-modules, learning outcomes, meta-analysis, physics education, senior high school

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. C. González-Salamanca, O. L. Agudelo, and J. Salinas, “Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 1-17, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122410366

F. Festiyed, A. Asrizal, and D. Desnita, “The analysis of effect size of the PBL model on science competence of high school students,” J. Pendidik. Sains Univ. Muhammadiyah Semarang, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 12–24, 2022.

M. Abelha, S. Fernandes, D. Mesquita, F. Seabra, and A. T. Ferreira-Oliveira, “Graduate employability and competence development in higher education: A systematic literature review using PRISMA,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 1-27, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12155900

L. I. González-Pérez and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, “Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1-31, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031493

S. Grassini, “Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and chatgpt in educational settings,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1-13, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13070692

C. Winberg et al., “Learning to teach STEM disciplines in higher education: A critical review of the literature,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 930–947, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1517735

M. Fidan and M. Tuncel, “Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635

M. A. Fadillah and S. Sahyar, “Development of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) test instruments on parabolic and circular motion materials in high schools,” Berk. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 329–338, 2023, doi: 10.20527/bipf.v11i3.16697

A. McStay, “The metaverse: Surveillant physics, virtual realist governance, and the missing commons,” Philos. Technol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2023, doi: 0.1007/s13347-023-00613-y

S. Turner, N. Harder, D. Martin, and L. Gillman, “Psychological safety in simulation: Perspectives of nursing students and faculty,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 122, pp. 1-7, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105712

A. N. Yunzal Jr and L. F. Casinillo, “Effect of physics education technology (PhET) simulations: Evidence from STEM students’ performance,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 2020, doi: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.27450

F. Novitra, “Networked-based inquiry: An effective physics learning in the new normal Covid-19 era in Indonesia,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 997–1016, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15255a

F. Novitra, “Development of online-based inquiry learning model to improve 21st-century skills of physics students in senior high school,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1-20, 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11152

B. P. Putra, “Development of SSCS-based e-modules (search, solve, create, share) to practice creative thinking skills of students on wave materials in high school,” IJOEM Indones. J. E-learning Multimed., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2022, doi: 10.58723/ijoem.v1i1.3

A. Ben Youssef, M. Dahmani, and L. Ragni, “ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: Exploring the digital divide,” Information, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13030129

T. He and C. Zhu, “Digital informal learning among chinese university students: The effects of digital competence and personal factors,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 44, pp. 1–19, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0082-x

S. Timotheou et al., “Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 6695–6726, 2023, 10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

I. Engeness, “Developing teachers’ digital identity: Towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 96–114, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1849129

E. van Laar, A. J. A. M. van Deursen, J. A. G. M. van Dijk, and J. de Haan, “The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 577–588, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.

N. Bergdahl, J. Nouri, and U. Fors, “Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 957–983, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09998-w

M. Z. Kamarudin, M. S. A. Mat Noor, and R. Omar, “A scoping review of the effects of a technology-integrated, inquiry-based approach on primary pupils’ learning in science,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 828–847, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2138847

M. Bond, K. Buntins, S. Bedenlier, O. Zawacki-Richter, and M. Kerres, “Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

D. E. Liana and M. Indrowati, “Development of e-modules based on guided inquiry to improve students’ critical thinking ability,” Nusant. Sci. Technol. Proc., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2022.

I. K. Suartama, L. P. P. Mahadewi, D. G. H. Divayana, and M. Yunus, “ICARE approach for designing online learning module based on LMS,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 305–312, 2022, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1619

A. Safitri, M. D. Permata, and I. Wilujeng, “The effect of using the e-module assisted by the kvisoft flipbook maker in improving student’s critical thinking skills during the covid-19 pandemic,” in 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 2021, pp. 545–551, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.078

F. K. Thang and J. H. L. Koh, “Deepening and transferring twenty-first century learning through a lower secondary integrated science module,” Learn. Res. Pract., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 148–162, 2017, doi: 10.1080/23735082.2017.1335426

C. K. Lo, “What is the impact of chatgpt on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1-15, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410

B. Rayan, W. Daher, H. Diab, and N. Issa, “Integrating PhET simulations into elementary science education: A qualitative analysis,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1-17, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13090884

Y.-H. Fan and T.-J. Lin, “Identifying university students’ online academic help-seeking patterns and their role in Internet self-efficacy,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100893

W. Istunıngsıh, B. Baedhowı, and K. B. Sangka, “The effectiveness of scientific approach using e-module based on learning cycle 7E to improve students’ learning outcome,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 75–85, 2018, doi: 10.24331/ijere.449313

D. Desnita, F. Festiyed, F. Novitra, A. Ardiva, and M. Y. Navis, “The effectiveness of CTL-based physics e-module on the improvement of the creative and critical thinking skills of senior high school students,” Tim J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 802–810, 2022, doi: 10.18421/TEM112-38

A. Asrizal, A. M. Zan, V. Mardian, and F. Festiyed, “The impact of static fluid e-module by integrating STEM on learning outcomes of students,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 110–118, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jet.v6i1.42458

K. Kallas and M. Pedaste, “How to improve the digital competence for e-learning?,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 1-12, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12136582

Y. Zhao, A. M. P. Llorente, and M. C. S. Gómez, “Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Educ., vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

E. Sarva, G. Lāma, A. Oļesika, L. Daniela, and Z. Rubene, “Development of education field student digital competences—student and stakeholders’ perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1-16, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15139895

A. Hadianto, “Meta analysis the use of e-modules based on research based learning models,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1481, no. 1, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012067

A. Asrizal, Y. Yurnetti, and E. A. Usman, “ICT thematic science teaching material with 5e learning cycle model to develop students’ 21st-century skills,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33764

A. Asrizal, M. Marjuni, R. Habibah, and S. Asiah, “Meta-analysis of the effect of e module on students’ critical and creative thinking skill in science learning,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 141–147, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2696

Y. I. Putra, R. Fadli, and S. Dahry, “Meta analyzing the ease of use of e-modules in learning,” J. Inov. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 338–343, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jitp.v10i4.62229

C. A. Lara-Alvarez, E. F. Parra-González, M. A. Ortiz-Esparza, and H. Cardona-Reyes, “Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1-10, 2023, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13569

R. M. Suparman and Y. Helsa, “Enhancing spatial visualization in CABRI 3D-assisted geometry learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 248-259, 2024, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2046

Y. Helsa, Turmudi, & Juandi, D, “Hybrid learning for conceptual understanding skills in mathematics: A meta-analysis,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 355–363, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1814

M. L. Santos and M. Prudente, “Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in science education: A meta-analysis,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2022, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598

R. P. Antonio and R. R. Castro, “Effectiveness of virtual simulations in improving secondary students’ achievement in physics: A meta-analysis.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 533-556, 2023, doi: 10.29333/iji.2023.16229a

F. Mufit, A. Asrizal, and R. Puspitasari, “Meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive conflict on physics learning,” J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2020, doi: 10.21009/1.06213

M. A. Fadillah, A. Hirahmah, S. Puspita, and R. P. Jannati, “Effect of STEM on student learning outcomes and gender differences in senior high school: A meta-analysis 2,” sciety, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2024, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/jk3v4

A. Funa, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 69-84, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.1445a

D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and t PRISMA Group*, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” Ann. Intern. Med., vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 264–269, 2009, doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge, 2013, doi: 10.4324/9780203771587

M. Zuo, S. Kong, Y. Ma, Y. Hu, and M. Xiao, “The effects of using scaffolding in online learning: A meta-analysis,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1-12, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13070705

R. Y. N. Hakim, D. G. Tamtomo, and B. Murti, “Effect of gluten free casein free diet on maladaptive behavior in autistic children: Meta analysis.,” Indonesian Journal of Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 286-294, 2023, doi: 10.26911/theijmed.2023.08.03.06

D. Narulita and D. Aprilianto, “Meta-analysis study: Is dental health education effective to improve knowledge, attitude, and behavior in adolescents?,” J. Heal. Promot. Behav., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 197–207, 2022, doi: 10.26911/thejhpb.2022.07.03.03

G. H. Guyatt et al., “GRADE guidelines: 7. rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency,” J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1294–1302, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

S. A. Endaryati, S. St Y, and K. C. Suryandari, “Problem-based learning flipbook e-module in improving students’ critical thinking skills in "always save energy" thematic learning,” Int. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 115–123, 2023, doi: 10.23887/ijee.v7i1.58306

E. Fitriani and F. Festiyed, “The effect of stem integrated physics e-modules to improve critical thinking ability of class XI students of sman 2 lubuk sikaping,” Phys. Learn. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 124–129, 2023, doi: 10.24036/ple.v1i2.57

B. Kristiantari, A. Purwanto, and D. H. Putri, “Implementasi e-modul fisika pada materi listrik statis dengan menerapkan model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sma,” J. Kumparan Fis., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2023, doi: 10.33369/jkf.6.1.17-26

A. Nurmahmuddin, N. Nana, and R. Rizal, “The influence of e-module based on guided inquiry learning model on students’ critical thinking skills in the topic of work and energy,” Gravity J. Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 144-154, 2023, doi: 10.30870/gravity.v9i2.17801

F. Festiyed, A. Asrizal, and D. Desnita, “Effect of STEM integrated physics e-modules to improve creative thinking ability,” Pillar Phys. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 2023.

R. Sujanem, I. N. P. Suwindra, and I. Suswandi, “Efektivitas e-modul fisika berbasis masalah berbantuan simulasi phet dalam ujicoba terbatas untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Undiksha, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2022.

R. N. Hasibuan and R. A. Sani, “The effect of the e-module-assisted guided inquiry model through student learning outcomes in substance pressure material,” Tarb. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2023.

E. Yulyanti, A. Maftukhin, and R. W. Akhdinirwanto, “Development of ethnoscience-based physics e-module using Kvisoft Flipbook Maker to improve students’ science literacy skills,” Konstan-Jurnal Fis. dan Pendidik. Fis., vol. 7, no. 02, pp. 134–143, 2022. doi: 10.20414/konstan.v7i02.191

N. Ramadhanty, D. Desnita, A. Asrizal, and Y. Darvina, “Perbandingan hasil belajar siswa menggunakan e-modul berbasis CTL dengan buku teks fisika pada materi hukum newton gravitasi dan usaha energi kelas X SMAN 2 Padang,” Pillar Phys. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 419–426, 2020.

S. Mayanty, I. M. Astra, and C. E. Rustana, “Efektifitas penerapan e-modul berbasis problem based learning (PBL) terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa sma,” Navig. Phys. J. Phys. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2020, doi: 10.30998/npjpe.v2i2.477




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i3.21641

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License