School Learning Practice Program in Improving Pedagogical Competence of Preservice Teachers

Muhammad Mustofa

Abstract


This study examines the evaluation of the learning practice program at school, specifically the practical field experience program organized by the Education Laboratory of the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. This program seeks to develop the pedagogical ability of preservice teachers through hands-on experience in the field. This research employed a mixed method, also known as evaluation research. The researchers employed the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model to assess the program's effectiveness. The findings reveal that the practical field experience program improves preservice teachers' pedagogical competence. However, it still requires improvement and development in various areas, including choosing preferred schools/madrasas, implementation time, and the number of teaching practices. The findings of this study show that program participants who adhere to the program receive more expertise in real-world classroom learning practices. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the practical field experience program at the FITK UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta helps develop the pedagogical competence of preservice teachers. However, it requires further improvement and development to improve program quality.

Keywords


Learning Practice, teachers’ competences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. In Perdana Publishing (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Entang, M. (1980). Program Pengalaman Lapangan. Proyek Pengembangan Pendidikan Guru Depdiknas.

Hidayat, T., & Asyafah, A. (2019). KONSEP DASAR EVALUASI DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DI SEKOLAH. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v10i1.3729

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta’dib: Journal of Pesantren Education, 6(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551

Mardicko, A. (2022). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(4), 5482–5492.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, cet. In XI. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Panduan, T. P. (2019). Buku Panduan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL). Unit Laoratorium Pendidikan FITK.

PP. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru.

Rifai, N., Fauzan, Sayuti, W., & Bahrissalim. (2014). Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum di UIN se-Indonesia; Evaluasi Penerapan Integrasi Keilmuan UIN dalam Kurikulum dan Proses Pembelajaran. Tarbiya; Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 1(1), 13–33.

Saefiana, Sukmawati, F. D., Rahmawati, Rusnady, D. A. M., Sukatin, & Syaifuddin. (2022). Teori Pembelajaran dan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar. MAHAGURU: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 150–158.

Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaf, Kualitif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulo, S. L. La. (1984). Pengajaran Mikro. Dirjen Pendidikan TInggi.

Taulabi, I. (2017). Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Integrasi Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v28i2.488

Zaenal, A. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran. In Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/002024152314000

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License
Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicenseCopyright © UIN Raden Intan LampungAll rights reserved.