APPLICATION OF CONTRA LEGEM IN JUDGE DECISIONS (Critical Study of Iddah Alimony Rights in Divorce Cases)

Endang Ali Maksum, S. Suharto, K. Khairuddin, Z. Zuhraini, Is Susanto

Abstract


The subject of this study is based on article 149 letters (b) Compilation of Islamic law which reads: ex-husband must provide maintenance, maskan, and kiswah to ex-wife during the iddah, unless the ex-wife has been granted talaq bain or nusyuz and is not pregnant. There are two barriers for an ex-wife to earn a living during the period of iddah, namely because the wife is divorced ba'in and or because the ex-wife is nusyuz. In general, the wife filed for divorce in court because she could no longer stand her husband's treatment of her. As a result of the law, if the wife who filed for divorce sues the Court, then the panel of judges will issue a divorce. Unless the husband violates the talaq. In the context of the wife falling into the act of nusyuz, generally as a result of the treatment and conduct of the husband towards the wife. If this is returned to the sound of the law then it will be very felt the injustice received by the wife (ex-wife). This study seeks to find the answer from the formulation of the problem "Why is contra legem important for the judge in deciding the case (inconcritoplaintiff) divorce with the decision of talaq ba'in and or proven in court nusyus wife's arbitrary because of the husband treatment of his wife? Materials and data are obtained by methods library research, the nature of the research is normative research. The goal to be achieved is to provide an alternative solution in providing justice and legal protection to women (ex-wives) who do not get iddah alimony because of filing a lawsuit or nusyus with a theory approach contra legem. Positive law in practice is not sufficiently able to accommodate the legal facts revealed in the Court, in another narrative it can be said that positive law always lags behind social reality. So in the legal system in Indonesia, the judge's ijtihad to deviate and or find the law is accommodated by the principle of Contra legemin order to provide justice and benefits to the community seeking justice, the judge needs to do contra legem.

Keywords: Contra Legem; Iddah Livelihood; Divorce Lawsuit; Judge's Decision


Full Text:

PDF

References


al-Ansari, Z. (tt.). Fath al-Wahhab Syarh Manhaj al-Tullab. Dar al-Fikr.

al-Jandi, M. al-Syahat. (2000). Al-Miras fi Syari’ah al-Islam. Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.

al-Jaziri, A. (2004). Al-Fiqh ‘ala al-Mazahib al-Arba’ah: Vol. IV. Dar al-Hadis.

al-Sairazi, A. I. (tt.). Al-Muhazzab: Vol. II. Mathba’ah al-Babil Halabi.

Al-Bujairimi. (1981). Bujairimi ‘ala al-Khathib: Vol. IV. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Bukhari. (2003). Sahih al-Bukhari: Vol. II. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Dardir. (2004). Syarh al-Saghir bi Hasyiyah al-Sawi: Vol. II. Dar al-Ma’arif.

Ali, A. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan. Kencana.

Ali, Z. (2009). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia (Vol. 3). Sinar Grafika.

Al-Juza, I. (1999). Al-Qawanin al-Fiqhiyah. Mathba’ah al-Mahdhah.

Al-Kassani. (2006). Bada’i al-Sana’i fi Tartibi al-Syara’: Vol. IV. Dar al-Hadis.

Al-Mawardi, A. H. (2009). Al-Hawi al-Kabir: Vol. XI. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Qurthubi. (2003). Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam al-Qur’an: Vol. III. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (2007). Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu: Vol. IX. Dar al-Fikr.

Faisal, F., et.al. (2021). Creative Commons License sebagai Hak Cipya Internasional Ditinjau Berdasarkan Aspek Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 5(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v5i2.10186

Fanani. (2014). Berfilsafat. Mandar Maju.

Hakim, A. (2017). Menakar Rasa Keadilan pada Putusan Hakim Perdata Terhadap Pihak Ketiga yang bukan Pihak Berdasarkan Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.361-378

Hammam, I. (2003). Fathul Qadir Syarh al-Hidayah: Vol. III. Mustofa Muhammad.

Hasfaki. (1998). Hasyiyah Radd al-Mukhtar Libnu ’Abidin ’Ala Durr al-Mukhtar: Vol. II. Makthba’ah al-Babil Halabi.

Jaib, S. A. (1998). Al-Qamus al-Fiqh Lughatan wa Isthilahan. Dar al-Fikr.

Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. CREPIDO, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22

KHI. (2012). Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dilengkapi dengan: UU Nomer 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, UU Nomer 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf, UU Nomer 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat, Fatwa MUI tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama dan Wakaf Uang serta Zakat. Nuansa Aulia.

Lathif, N. (2017). Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana / Alat untuk Memperbaharui atau Merekayasa Masyarakat. 3, 22.

Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhammad, A. (2014). Hukum Perdata Indonesia (Ke-5). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mukhidin. (2014). Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume 1(No. 3). http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/viewFile/1488/1156

Pane, E., et.al. (2021). Social Forestry: The Balance between Welfare and Ecological Justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.10

Qadamah, I. (2002). Al-Mughni: Vol. VII. Dar al-Fikr.

Rahardjo, S. (2007). Biarkan Hukum Mengalir (Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum). Buku Kompas.

Sabiq, S. (2002). Fiqh al-Sunnah: Vol. II. Dar al-Fikr.

Santoso Az, L., & Yahyanto. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Setara Press.

Setiawan, I. K. O. (2011). Hukum Perdata Mengenai Orang dan Kebendaan. FH Utama Press.

UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Vollmar, H. F. A. (1989). Pengantar Studi Hukum Perdata. Rajawali Pers.

Wasil, N. F. M. (1999). Fiqh al-Mawaris wa al-Wasiyyah fi Syari’ah al-Islam: Dirasah Muqaranah. Al-Maktabah al-Taufiqiyyah.

Zahrah, M. A. (2001). Ahkam al-Tirkah wa al-Mawaris. Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/smart.v1i1.9794

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

EDITORIAL OFFICE ADDRESS

SMART: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity

Publisher: Fakultas Syari'ah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia.

Address: Jalan Letnan Kolonel H Jl. Endro Suratmin, Sukarame, Kec. Sukarame, Kota Bandar Lampung, Provinsi Lampung, Indonesia. 35131 Phone: (0721) 5617070, Website: https://www.radenintan.ac.id/


Creative Commons License Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.