ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' DECISIONS REGARDING ISLAMIC INHERITANCE CASES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR FAMILY LAW REFORM IN INDONESIA

Hervin Yoki Pradikta, Siti Mahmudah, Is Susanto

Abstract


There is a disparity between the decisions of the Religious Courts, the High Religious Courts and the decisions of the Supreme Court related to Islamic inheritance cases since first-instance and appellate-level decisions tend to use normative law, whereas at the cassation level decision has used a progressive legal paradigm. Therefore, this study aims to look at the judge's decision regarding inheritance cases and its implications for legal reform. This research is a qualitative research, a type of library research with the approach of the Legal Pluralism Triangle Concept by Werner Menski. This study uses the theory of legal discovery, maqasyid as-shari'ah, and progressive legal theory, and draws conclusions using inductive thinking. The results of this study indicate that the decisions of the Religious Courts and the High Religious Courts still use a conservative legal paradigm which tends to only serve as mouthpiece for laws, in contrast to the decisions of the Supreme Court which have described the existence of ijtihad by using a progressive or contextual legal paradigm. The implication of the decision on Islamic inheritance for family law reform in Indonesia is that the Supreme Court's decision can be used as jurisprudence andas a reference for realizing the unification of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia today.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustine, O. V. (2018). Keberlakuan Yurisprudensi pada Kewenangan Pengujian Undang-Undang dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1539

al-Amidi, Sayf al-Din Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali Muhammad (2003). Al-ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam (Juz IV). Maktabah Nazzar Mustafa al-Baz.

Alhamdani, A. K. (2021). Ijtihad Hakim terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama. Jurnal At-Tatbiq: Jurnal Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah, 6 (1).

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Badriyah, S. M. (2022). Sistem Penemuan Hukum dalam Masyarakat Prismatik. Sinar Grafika.

Cendana, A. (2017). Keadilan Restoratif dalam Putusan Hakim Dihubungkan dengan Hak Asasi Terdakwa (Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 317/PID.B/2008/PN.YK). Lex Administratum, 5 (4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/16138

Ekapaksi, L., & Ali, A. M. H. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Kasus Asuransi Syariah. Paradigma, 19 (2). https://doi.org/10.33558/paradigma.v19i2.4571

Faisal, F., et.al. (2021). Creative Commons License sebagai Hak Cipta Internasional Ditinjau Berdasarkan Aspek Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v5i2.10186

Fathony, A. (2019). Hermeneutika Negosiatif Khaled Abou El Fadl: Menangkal Otoritarianisme Tafsir Agama dalam Hukum Islam. AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v6i1.558

Fitriyani. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Nusyuz Perspektif Keadilan Gender. Publica Indonesia Utama.

Hadi, S. (2012). Metode Research II. Andi Offset.

Halim, Y., & Salim, H. (2019). Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan yang Belum Inkracht sebagai Novum dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v10i2.1226

Harun, N. (2017). Proses Peradilan dan Arti Sebuah Keyakinan Hakim dalam Memutus Suatu Perkara di Pengadilan Agama Manado. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 15 (2). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v15i2.479

Husien, S., & Khisni, A. (2017). Hukum Waris Islam di Indonesia (Studi Perkembangan Hukum Kewarisan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Praktek di Pengadilan Agama ). Jurnal Akta, 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2533

Kusumaajmadja, M. (1976). Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional,. Bina Cipta.

Lotulung, P. E. (1998). Peranan Yurisprudensi sebagai Sumber Hukum. BPHN Depkeham.

Maharani, P. A., Siyo, S., & Agusty, R. Z. (2019). Menyoal Disparitas Produk Hakim Pengadilan Agama Antara Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Legal Reasoning, 1 (2).

Maksum, E. A., et.al. (2021). Application of Contra Legem In Judge Decisions (Critical Study of Iddah Alimony Rights in Divorce Cases). SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v1i1.9794

Manan, A. (2006). Reformasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Manan, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Praktek Hukum Acara di Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.189-202

Nurnazli. (2019). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung tentang Pembagian Harta Bersama dan Implikasinya terhadap Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga di Indonesia [Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung].

Pasaribu, M. P. J., & Sirait, N. N. (2018). Triangular Concept of Legal Pluralism in the Establishment of Consumer Protection Law. E3S Web of Conferences, 52, 00032. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200032

Pradikta, H. Y., et.al. (2021). The Paradigm of Judge’s Thoughts In The Settlement of Islamic Inheritance Cases and Their Implications on Family Law Renewal in Indonesia (Study on Supreme Court Decision Number 721 K/Ag/2015, Supreme Court Decision Number 218 K/Ag/2016, and Supreme Court Decision Number 331/K/AG/2018). SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity, 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v1i2.11037

Rahman, F. (1995). Islam and Modernity (Terjemahan Ahsin Mohammad: Islam dan Modernitas: Tentang Transformasi Intelektual). Pustaka.

Siahaan, M. (2022). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Simanjuntak, E. (2019). Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16 (1).

Sisworo, S. K. (tt.). Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Filsafat Hukum. Universitas Diponegoro.

Sugiyono. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Susylawati, E. (2014). Penerapan Hukum Waris Islam dalam Perkara Waris di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v9i2.474

Taqiuddin, H. U. (2017). Penalaran Hukum (Legal Reasoning) dalam Putusan Hakim. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v1i2.343

Triana, N. (2015). Rekonstruksi Model Mediasi yang Diintegrasikan pada Hukum Acara Pengadilan Agama dalam Perspektif para Pihak (Studi Soci-Legal Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Se-Eks Karesidenan Banyumas). Deepublish.

Usman. (2015). Rekonstruksi Teori Hukum Islam; Membaca Ulang Pemikiran Reaktualisasi Hukum Islam Munawir Sjadzali. LKIS Pelangi Aksara.

Zuhroh, D. (2017). Konsep Ahli Waris dan Ahli Waris Pengganti: Studi Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama. Al-Ahkam, 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2017.27.1.1051




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/smart.v2i2.14626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

EDITORIAL OFFICE ADDRESS

SMART: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity

Publisher: Fakultas Syari'ah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia.

Address: Jalan Letnan Kolonel H Jl. Endro Suratmin, Sukarame, Kec. Sukarame, Kota Bandar Lampung, Provinsi Lampung, Indonesia. 35131 Phone: (0721) 5617070, Website: https://www.radenintan.ac.id/


Creative Commons License Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.