Metode Komparasi Al-Qur’an Dengan Pendekatan Biblikal

Jauhara Albar Rouhullah

Abstract


Abstract

The Qur'an and the biblical tradition are two text traditions that have intertwined since the time of the production of the al-Qur'an. Understanding the Koran during the pre-canonical period is a must. One method used for this is comparison, an act which will provide insight into how the Qur'an and biblical traditions complement one another. It has to be done right by not only showing similarities but also accentuating differences. In order to contribute to the academic world, the next step is to re-describe to see the causes of differences, depending on which side a researcher is looking for (historical, lexical, ethico-moral, etc.), he will find an outline that binds the two comparands, which will establish a theory.

 

Abstrak

Al-Qur’an dan tradisi biblikal adalah dua tradisi teks yang telah saling berkelindan sejak masa produksi al-Qur’an. Pembacaan al-Qur’an saat masa pre-canonical adalah hal yang harus dilakukan. Salah satu  metode yang digunakan untuk itu ialah komparasi, tindakan yang bisa memberikan pencerahan tentang bagaimana al-Qur’an dan tradisi biblikal saling mengisi satu sama lain. Ia harus dilakukan dengan benar yatu dengan tidak hanya menampilkan kesamaan namun juga menonjolkan perbedaan. Supaya memberikan sumbangsih terhadap dunia akademis, langkah selanjutnya yaitu melakukan deskripsi ulang untuk melihat penyebab perbedaan terjadi, tergantung dari sisi mana seorang peneliti mencari (sejarah, lexical, ethico-moral, dan lain sebagainya), dia akan menemukan satu garis besar yang mengikat dua comparand tersebut sehingga bisa memunculkan sebuah teori.  

Kata Kunci: Metode komparasi, al-Qur’an, Biblikal, Dialog antar Agama

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Bill, James A., dan John Alden Williams. Roman Catholics & Shiʻi Muslims: prayer, passion & politics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.

Brooke, George J. “CREATION IN THE BIBLICAL TRADITION.” Zygon 22, no. 2 (Juni 1987): 227–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1987.tb00848.x.

Doniger, Wendy. The implied spider: politics and theology in myth. Updated ed. Columbia classics in religion. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

Freiberger, Oliver. “Elements of a Comparative Methodology in the Study of Religion.” Religions 9, no. 2 (29 Januari 2018): 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9020038.

Freidenreich, David. “Comparisons Compared: A Methodological Survey of Comparisons of Religion from ‘A Magic Dwells’ to A Magic Still Dwells.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 16, no. 1 (2004): 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006804323055236.

Hanafi, Yusuf. “QURâANIC STUDIES DALAM LINTASAN SEJARA ORIENTALISME DAN ISLAMOLOGI BARA.” HERMENEUTIK, no. Vol 7, No 2 (2013): HERMENEUTIK (2013): 229–60.

Hinnells, John R., ed. The Routledge companion to the study of religion. 2nd ed. London ; New York: Routledge, 2010.

Kaltner, John. The Bible and the Quran: biblical figures in the Islamic tradition. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2018.

Kugel, James L., dan James L. Kugel. Traditions of the Bible: a guide to the Bible as it was at the start of the common era. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1998.

Neuwirth, Angelika, Nicolai Sinai, dan Michael Marx, ed. The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʾānic Milieu. Leiden: Brill, 2011.

Patton, Kimberley C., dan Benjamin C. Ray, ed. A magic still dwells: comparative religion in the postmodern age. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. Allah: God in the Qur’an. New Haven ; London: Yale University Press, 2020.

———. “Noah’s Lost Son in the Qurʾān.” Arabica 64, no. 2 (13 Juni 2017): 129–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-12341452.

———. The Qur’an and its biblical subtext. Routledge studies in the Qur’an 10. London ; New York: Routledge, 2010.

Rezazadeh, Morteza. “Mary in Early Christianity and Islam.” Religious Inquiries 6, no. 11 (2017): 37–49.

Robinson, Neal. Christ in Islam and Christianity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.

Stausberg, Michael, dan Steven Engler, ed. The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion. London ; New York: Routledge, 2011.

Wafa, Ahmad Zainul. “ANALISIS KOMPARASI TENTANG LARANGAN PERNIKAHAN DALAM HUKUM ISLAM DAN HINDU.” Al-Hukama’ : The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (30 Juni 2011): 52–69. https://doi.org/10.15642/al-hukama.2011.1.1.52-69.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v15i1.7768

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jauhara Albar Rouhullah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

    

Al-Dzikra [ISSN: 1978-0893, e-ISSN: 2714-7916] published by Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Office: Gedung Dekanat Lama Lt. 2, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung. Jl. Letkol H. Endro Suratmin, Sukarame, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia, KP. 34513. Website: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-dzikra/index, email: aldzikra@radenintan.ac.id

Creative Commons License
Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur'an dan al-Hadits is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.